User talk:Pluvia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Notability of The Wrath of Giga Bowser

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Wrath of Giga Bowser, by Sceptre (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Wrath of Giga Bowser seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Wrath of Giga Bowser, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


The article The Wrath of Giga Bowser has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn 01:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR violation

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Super Smash Bros. (series). Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

— Malcolm (talk) 13:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was undoing the edit of another editor who was undoing my edit to the page, I said that we should continue this in the talk pages aswell, which we did. I even have evidence that shows my edits to the page where justified and right. One was even from the creator of the game who agreed with what I was saying"

Decline reason: "Revert warring is always bad. Please make sure you understand our three-revert rule policy. Your contributions are welcome after the block expires. — -- lucasbfr talk 15:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Luigi

Allow me to make a few things clear with your argument. First, we have no idea if that man is with the development team on Brawl. For all we know he's just a random Nintendo employee. Saying that he's part of the development team is pure speculation (Especially since the development for Brawl is in Japan, as stated on the old Dojo site.)

Second, the reason it's removed if it's been brought up before is because of exactly that. It's been brought up before, and we do not need a second topic about it. You may list to the discussion beforehand in the edit summary, which, I admit, I failed to do, and the reason for that is as follows:

I thought it was brought up before on Wikipedia, however, I was wrong. I remember taking place in a similar situation on a different site, and for a moment I thought it was Wikipedia, but I can't seem to find it. It may have been a diffrent site after all, so I'll go ahead and revert that, but my above points still stand. Dengarde ► Complaints 07:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pikmin & Olimar Brawl.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pikmin & Olimar Brawl.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pikmin & Olimar Brawl.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pikmin & Olimar Brawl.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Obvious Troll

You clueless fuck. Comradeash (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Touched a nerve? Why don't you join your confederate then. Difference being, he was joking. Comradeash (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)