User talk:PLM Scholar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Your edit to Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Main Campus
Your recent edit to Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Main Campus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of List of the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila degree programs
An editor has nominated List of the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila degree programs, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila degree programs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Lacson.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lacson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. bluemask (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:220px-PlmLogo-FabianSantos.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:220px-PlmLogo-FabianSantos.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 08:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:220px-PlmLogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:220px-PlmLogo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 08:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:220px-PlmLogo-FabianSantos.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:220px-PlmLogo-FabianSantos.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PLM logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PLM logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PLM logo1.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PLM logo1.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:PLM logo1.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:PLM logo1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PLM Logo Copyright Violation
The User of this image (PLM Logo/seal) has committed a Copyright Violation/Infringement.
I am the copyright owner of this logo/image, this is my original creative work, and as such it is protected with my copyrights under the law. You can verify my claim with the websites that I maintain:
www.PLM.net.ms
www.friendster.com/plm1
www.friendster.com/plm2
www.friendster.com/fabian
Obviously, you can read my name in the bottom part of the image (Fabian T. Santos) I have not released it in the public domain. Hence, the user must seek permission to me first before using the image and must attribute/cite my name: Fabian T. Santos, in the caption.
Pls. remove this image and warn the user. Unless I have permitted the user to use it or cites my name I will allow it. But as of now, he has not sought my permission nor attributed/cited my name on it.
Thanks and I hope you will abide by the copyright laws. Hoping for your immediate and responsible actions.
as always,
Fabian T. Santos ©
[edit] Copyright problems with Image:PLM logo.jpg
FTSantos ©Bot 17:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] USER: PLM Scholars Comment
PLM Scholars Comment:
Hey...(fabyan17)
I believe that you are a die-hard PLM alumnus. But please stop posting your Yahoo group as one of the external links for PLM articles because it is SIMPLY IRRELEVANT. And, also please cease from insisting that your PLM E-group article here at Wikipedia be revived because it is VERY INSIGNIFICANT and SO UNENCYCLOPEDIC.
MY RESPONSE to User: PLM Scholar:
How can the PLM e-group be insignificant, when in fact it was officiated and administered by then Dean of Mass Communication, Dr. Barrios. This was authorized by the admin. in 2005, in order to connect and find all PLMayers around the globe because they will be celebrating the PLM Ruby Anniv. back then, and they want to inform all iskos for the said Homecoming. Do you know the meaning of- IRRELEVANT? your actions are the IRRELEVANT ones. just for your info kapatid, PLM E-group is the most active PLM internet forum today; it has members from the pioneer PLM batch of 1960's up to the present batch, half of the members are alumni, the rest are students and faculty. Have you visited or joined the PLM e-group? haven't you seen the NEWS & ANNOUNCMENTS about PLM in that forum? haven't you read the SIGNIFICANT inquiries of the students/alumni which is being answered in that forum?
Lack of Knowledge Destroys people and it is very dangerous. You should have atleast investigated or have a background check of the PLM E-group to know if it is IRRELEVANT or not important. Have you read the rationale/rules of wikipedia? do they consider e-groups as irrelevant EXTERNAL link, (not internal)? You are making your own rules, based on bias emotions. You don't even check the other external links if they are legitimate or related to PLM, a lot of the links are dead/non-existent. You should have removed or updated those links but then you only focus your bias perception to the PLM E-group which is undeniably a RELEVANT PLM "EXTERNAL" link. (It is a LINK and not an ARTICLE)
You can even find the PLM E-group link in the AP Official website (PLM websites link):
http://www.angpamantasan.org/common_files/plm_sites.htm
If AP (together with thousands of PLMayers in the PLM E-group) considers it RELEVANT, who are you to classify it as IRRELEVANT?
It is even listed in the BESTDISCUSSIONGROUPS.COM (a listing of relevant, best and most active e-groups in the world:
http://www.bestdiscussiongroups.com/cat2464/5.htm
(Since you've put the level of this discussion in a "personal" one, here's a personal comment to you) PLM Scholar, you even use the username PLM scholar, when you don't even scholarly investigated if the PLM E-group is relevant or not. That is the real funny action. But I won't laugh bec. You are my kapwa isko and I care for that matter.
PLM Scholars Comment:
Can I also comment on the forum that you posted at the Philippine government website? I am also a PLM alumnus, and I know that PLM is truly among the best universities in the country, but the way you presented PLM at the forum site was so unscholarly. Kakahiya kasi parang cuentong cuchero ang dating. You even have the nerve to add the phrase, "humbly speaking..." Have you seen the comments of some people who were able to come across your forum post? You could've presented PLM better and defended why it is indeed one of the bests through factual assertions and references... KAKATAWA IYONG FORUM POSTS mo sa www.gov.ph site!!!
I WILL STOP placing your so-called "PLM E-Group logo" as PLM logo here. So, PLEASE STOP putting back your Yahoo group. Your Yahoo group belongs to Yahoo. Kakatawa ka talaga...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by PLM Scholar
MY RESPONSE: Thanks for the unsolicited and IRRELEVANT comment about my post in the gov.ph, (since this discussion is just for wikipedia and not other sites - IRRELEVANT one, but ok I will respond)
Salamat po at nabasa mo din pala un FORUM dun, alam mo ba ibigsabihin ng FORUM kapatid? ang forum sa www.gov.ph ay isang informal forum na kung saan naglalagay ka ng persnoal na opinion mo, hindi po iyon encyclopedia or wikipedia na kung saan formal at hindi personal na opinyon ang ilalagay.
Para sayo "unscholarly" un, para sa akin I'm just expressing my own personal opinion. Lahat tayo my right s freedom of expression, as long as hindi naman ako nagmura o nanakit sa forum na un ay hindi po un masama. Alam mo kapatid, sana makapag-aral kadin ng konting Mass Communication or ung mga Advertising or PR strategy course para malaman mo kung bakit ganun ang inilagay kong post. Catchy di ba? nag-react ka nga eh. Ganun po ang public at informal forum, dapat mag-lagay ka ng catchy message mo at hindi kailangan encyclopedic o "scholarly" basta hindi ka nambabastos. Nagbasa ka ba ng ibang ost dun sa forum na un? kitam hindi mo ba napansin na mas-masahol pa ung iba sa mga posts at topics nila. Kailangan siguro kapatid, lagi ka muna mag-imbestiga at mag-research bago ka mag-comment kasi panay unang bugso lang ng isip at emosyon mo ang lumalabas sa mga sulat mo sa akin eh.
Pag-aralan mo din ung code of ethics ng journalism para may idea ka sa mga sinasabi ko, hindi ko minamaliit ang kaalaman mo bilang chemical engineer, pero mabuti siguro kung idevelope at pagyamanin mo din ang alam mo sa hindi mo field na mass communication, journalism at mga definitions ng words lalo sa meaning ng IRRELEVANT at FORUM kapatid.
Pati din sa rules ng copyrights, alam mo kapatid kahit ilang beses mo pa ilagay ung PLM logo na ginawa at inupload ko,idedelete padin un ng wikipedia kapag walang attribution/citation. Kasi ako padin po ang copyright owner noon, kasi nga according sa batas creative work ko po un image na un (hindi ung design ha). Andun nga ung name ko eh. kahit tanggalin o ideface mo ung image dun. ako padin copyright owner nun, kaya naman tinatanggal ng wikipedia admin ung mga logo na ina-upload mo kasi, hindi mo nilalagay sa source kung sino talaga ang gumawa. kailangan may attribution/citation po iyon sa author. Eh ang nilalagay mo lang PLM website ang source, that is IRRELEVANT my friend. At for your info. i'm not hungry for recognition, i'm just asserting my copyrights according to the law. Subukan mong gumawa ng libro, tula or creative work, i-aattribute din po ang name mo doon hindi dahil gusto mo ma-recognize ka pero dahil un ang protocol at nirerequire ng copyright laws. Kapag nag-aral ka po ng mass comm or related course, yan din po ang ituturo sa iyo ng prof mo. Sumusunod lang ako sa tinuro sa akin ng prof ko sa PLM. (Ingat lang kapatid, kasi baka ma-block ka sa wikipedia dahil sa persistent copyrights violation)
Maraming salamat sa mga mensahe mo kapatid ha, sana lang next time ung may basehan at backed-up with relevant info, background, source at mag-research po tayo at mag-imbestiga kasi un ang masnakakatawa eh. Ung daldal ng daldal ng walang alam sa sinasabi diba? sabi nga sa pinag-aralan nating Law/Pol Sci. kung natatandaan mo pa po "Nemo dat quet non habet" - You Cannot Give Something Which You Don't Have...
God bless us po, walang personalan kapatid ha. Trabaho lang. :)
Mabuhay tayo isko at si HESUS!
Kapwa mo isko - FABIAN T. SANTOS ===PLM E-group Head Moderator=== FTSantos ©Bot 09:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Aicelle_santos.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aicelle_santos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:April_tanhueco.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:April_tanhueco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:999401757m.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:999401757m.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
