Template talk:Platonism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Yes on box
The box is definitely the right way to go. Hang in there.Dave 17:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Larouche
I don't think it should be especially necessary to prove why Lyndon Larouche should have no place on this template, but here it goes: (1) He is separated by hundreds of years from the other individuals mentioned on this template; (2) not coincidentally, his thinking bears the imprint of innumerable influences posterior even to late Neoplatonism, from Leibnitz to Trotsky and from Jefferson to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion; and (3) he is not a particularly important philosopher. Larouche is not within Platonism, let alone a figure of stature within Platonism. Q·L·1968 ☿ 17:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)