Talk:Player Piano (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
I think the statement "technically science fiction" is suspect - basically it seems to be saying that science fiction doesn't cover characters or social themes. Good science fiction often does. Also "sci-fi" is a loaded phrase. This seems to be a repeat of the old mantra "this is literature, so it can't be science fiction, because that's trash"... Notinasnaid 07:24, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
There is now a link from the protagonist's name, Paul Proteus. It doesn't seem likely there will be an entry on him, so I propose removing the linking. Notinasnaid 09:35, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] In my opinion, Player Piano is one of Vonnegut's best
novels. On Amazon, the editorial reviewer essentially dismisses it as "sci fi." The review sounds as if he or she never read it. But the customer reviewers laud it and seem to have read it carefully. I propose a link to the Player Piano page on Amazon to get people more excited about the novel and help the cross fertilization of ideas. -Richard Peterson
- Glad to hear you like the book; I sure did too. However, I don't think linking to the Amazon page will pass muster. It would be an endorsement of a specific online retailer, which in this community is generally a no-no. (We provide the ISBN number, which lets readers check for themselves if they're motivated enough to click the mouse a few times.) Anville 14:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A couple edits needed about the characters?
A couple observations on the character bios which might need editing: Anita: "However, she can not bear children which hinders Paul from continuing his family's success and prestige through a child." Is this reasoning about hindering Paul ever mentioned explicitly in the novel? I agree that it may be implied, but I think it's probably the least important of the issues coming from Anita's inability to have children. From my perspective, this was related mostly to the fact that she thought she was pregnant (when she just had some disorder related to her barrenness), which ultimately led Paul to decide to marry her. This causes a resentment (more about the forced marriage than the lack of children) that shows up in the story. Also, the lack of children allows Paul to ignore many of the problems of having children (IQ testing in particular) until the time of the story, when he suddenly is confronted by a number of stories from parents distressed about their children, allowing the problems with the system to become more apparent to him.
Also, Kroner: "...and he even refers to his wife as "mother" when speaking of her to Paul. He's overtly sexist..." Actually _everyone_ calls Mrs. Kroner "Mom" (not "Mother"), and she refers to everyone as her "children" as well. Everyone uses the term freely when they speak to her (to her face), and she encourages it; it's not a sexist title to her. And Kroner is not anymore sexist than any of the other characters of the story. This was written in the 50s -- they go on an all-male company retreat (with "the women and children" in a separate facility), all the business talk is among men, etc. The society may be sexist, as is clear anytime the role of women in society is mentioned at all, but Kroner is not exceptional in this respect. Just my opinion.... Jzmckay 05:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree w/Jzmckay & took out the stuff about the family's "success and prestige" and instead said her apparent pregnancy caused their quick marriage.Rich 00:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Utopia14(Vonnegut).jpg
Image:Utopia14(Vonnegut).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
