Talk:Plans (album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
What about Directions? -LK
- I put in a short mention of it :) Snoopydance 01:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>
- All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 23:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] iTunes Bonus Track
There is an additional track available when purchasing the entire album from iTunes. The track is titled Start Again (iTunes Version) [Bonus Track] and is 2 minutes, 38 seconds long. I did not know if it belongs in the article or not, so I will let someone else decide. :) MrHen. 15:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Indie
How is Transatlanticism an "indie" record? The album was released by Atlantic... You can't get much more non-indie than that...
Alstan Faber 12:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
You're quite mistaken. Plans was in fact the first album the band released under the Atlantic label; Transatlanticism was the last they released for Barsuk, the Washington-based indie label. So... in conclusion, maybe knowing more abut the band before talking would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.221.197.83 (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Plans.jpg
Image:Plans.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
