Talk:Place de la Concorde

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Place de la Concorde article.

Article policies
Place de la Concorde is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

The discussion of the Revolutionary era seems to be on the melodramatic and the exaggerated side. David.Monniaux 22:45, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Not only that, but the dates are all wrong. I'm editing the paragraph. RodC 14:52, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Curiously, the article's history is not showing my edits. The article itself looks fine, though. RodC 15:19, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

originally the Hotel De Crillon was not a hotel in the modern meaning of the word. there was no such a thing then. Hotel(proper name is hotel particulier) in French originally meant a town mansion built for aristocratic families. They stayed there when in town (their primary residence was a castle in whatever province of France their family came from). The hotel de Crillon was built for the Duke of Crillon. There are many other similar "hotels" in Paris (and all over France)that never were and still are not hotels for tourists but mansions that are either still privately owned or are museums, government buildings etc. for example Hotel Sale(Picasso museum), Hotel de Sens(library), Hotel de Soubise (archives), Hotel Carnavalet (museum), Hotel de Matignon (prime minister office)and many mores. J-L B. april 30 2006

[edit] Vandalism

This page has had virtually no useful edits since 8 October 2007, but it has been vandalized by 9 different IPs. There has also been a good-faithed edit by a registered user (Gavigan01), but I reverted it because it was simply adding a very low-quality night photo to the article -- there are better ones on Wikimedia Commons, in case someone feels a night photo is necessary. Part of the vandalism was reverted within minutes, but the rest went completely unnoticed. The last contributor to this page said:

(cur) (last) 19:24, 8 October 2007 Ghirlandajo (Talk | contribs) (8,270 bytes) (since nobody seems to watch this page, it should be semiprotected) (undo)

so I'll follow his advice and request semiprotection as nothing has changed since then. --Sgt. Salt (talk) 19:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)