Talk:Pixie dust (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This seems to conflict with WP:DAB which states that disambiguation pages should not contain content, but only links to other pages? Shouldn't the content either be simply deleted (only the second reference to IBM "pixie dust" seems to have any real validity), or the appropriate pages created? 78.86.33.152 (talk) 23:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I disagree in the sense that a small explanation that allows the user to know what each reference is without clicking the link is useful and always included and the third entry is ok as a placeholder, but actually it would be great if someone with background in medicine and / or biology (I am not one, sorry...) could write something for the third entry, then move any reference (possibly along with this one? http://www.badscience.net/?p=664) there....ntg (talk) 23:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)