Talk:Pixel advertising
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
jamie, if you don't want the link, fine, but please be polite about it. "Spammer" is not a particularly polite term, and please read before removing the content, which was relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.205.186 (talk • contribs)
- Reponse Other than that one sentence, all of your only contributions thus far have been commercial links. A few whois searches reveal that all of those domains are registered to the same individual in NJ. Wikipedia calls that spamming. OhNoitsJamieTalk 01:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
** Hi there, I added some more info to the stub and I plan to come back with a more detailed study on pixel ads (it's not finished yet). Please let me know if you believe the objectivity of the text I added is up to Wikipedia's standards. Thanks, Michael (Pixeladsinfo (talk · contribs))
- Comment Unfortunately, most of the new addition consists of unsourced assertions and a link to a commercial site. Though the link is labeled as a "reference," the content doesn't provide any evidence backing up the assertions that I can see. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prod tag
I think this concept (and the example described) has received ample media attention to establish notability. I've added a an addition reference to the article from the Wall Street Journal that specifically uses the term "pixel advertising." OhNoitsJamieTalk 04:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
