Talk:Pit (Nintendo)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Speculation (SSBB)
I removed this passage from the article: Most, if not all, of Pit's attacks and traits in Super Smash Bros. Brawl are based on his abilities in Kid Icarus and the legendary treasures he gains in each level which are used in the final level to greatly increase his power, such as the wings that allow him to fly.
While this is likely to be true there's no way of verifying this as the game is still being developed and has not yet been presented for anyone to play outside of the development studio. --Ryuukuro 15:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sequal speculation
I removed this part of the page "Also Pit might return in the Nintendo Wii rumored title Kid Icarus Wii, as the starring role."
He might also return in an upcoming Street fighter game, but that's not very varifiable either. I know Miyamoto has made comments on a possible revival, and I suppose that and that alone might be worth noting, but there is no such title, tentative or otherwise, called Kid Icarus Wii, as far as we know. It's just a rumour, and rumours are not the type of thing Wikipedia should be spreading. Xubelox 01:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article change
I think this article should be at Pit (Nintendo) because:
- In line with other articles like Toad (Nintendo) and Wart (Nintendo)
- No need to be so elaborate (such as the Kid Icarus name) - there is only one Pit. Wart (Nintendo) is named like so, instead of something like Wart (Super Mario Bros.)
- "Character" has long since been dropped from article titles; i.e. the game or franchise they cover is sufficient, such as Raiden (Metal Gear), or Persephone (The Matrix) instead of Persephone (Matrix character)
Thanks. Hbdragon88 04:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. The article would be better off as Pit (Kid Icarus) because:
- the charcter is often called "Kid Icarus"
- it is more precise than the generic "Nintendo" clarification
- it is in line with the naming of articles such as Link (Legend of Zelda) (a featured article, unlike Toad (Nintendo) and Wart (Nintendo))
- Guermantes 01:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
LOL @ your "a featured article" comment. As if naming convention had anything to do with whether a article got featured or not - it has absolutely no bearing. It just so happenst that Wikipedians did more work with citing references and the such on for that article as opposed to other articles. Hbdragon88 05:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, I concede. I suppose "Pit" is vague enough to require more disambiguation just like Link (Legend of Zelda) did. I've asked for a speedy move to Pit (Kid Icarus); let's hope it happens, otherwise I'll ahve to submit it to WP:RM. Hbdragon88 18:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inclusion in N64 title?
- "Pit was planned to be included in Super Smash Bros. but because of the sucess of Pokemon he was replaced by Jigglypuff."
What is the source on this? Kflester 17:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- I do not believe there is a source on this information anyway. Best off to delete it. 124.182.156.211 15:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Far too many images
There are far too many fair use images in this article. One image to display what the character looks like is acceptable, and perhaps others to display their appearance within other games, but not this many. I am removing the gallery, and I urge other editors to have a think about which of these images are really needed in the article. J Milburn 15:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Left-Handed?
Yet he's holding the bow in his right? Pluvia 14:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, when firing a bow, you hold it in your offhand, and pull the string with your main hand. Machee 03:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyrighted
Is Pit copyrighted???? Mr. Mario 192 17:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Does it particularly matter? Treynate2 20:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pierrot
The reference to Pierrot hardly seems "obvious" as the article currently claims. The Pierrot article it links to provides no information that would support it. Unless this is clarified or validated by some reference, I would recommend removing it.Brinmat (talk) 08:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I have no idea what this 'obvious' reference is. I support it's removal from the article. Doktor Waterhouse (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 14
i herd that he is now 14 years old do you think its true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.96.255 (talk) 19:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Snapshots
Please consider adding this gallery as a list of relevant photos about Pit RyanTMulligan (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)