Talk:Piracetam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Piracetam article.
Article policies
Piracetam is part of WikiProject Pharmacology, a project to improve all Pharmacology-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other pharmacology articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance for this Project's importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Europe

The prescription data are not concerning that Piracetam is widely presribed in Europe, as the article is saying. There are big differences between countries. In Germany Piracetam had a due of about 30% on the Anti-Dementiva market in 2004 (see: Arzneimittelreport 2005), but this due is declining cause the studies with Alzheimer patients getting Piracetam saying that Piracetam is not better than other and cheaper

[edit] Fan

Piractetam is an excellent drug to put me in the mood for a period of intellectual concentration. Its effects are similar to caffeine but without the fast comedown. Whereas a cup of coffee may have some effect for 15 minutes or so 250mg of piractetam will make you feel relaxed enough for about 4 to 5 hours during which time I can usually get started whatever task I have in hand. I always find it difficult to concentrate unless everything in my life is running smoothly which it seldom is. I take it quite often and have noticed no negative effects. The best place to buy it is from a pharmacy over the counter in Spain. No prescription is required.

[edit] questionable

Why is it that on a smal scale tested proof has been reported, with positive result.When I was searching a test on a large scale I found nothing, only one; on 3000 person in Australia who reported that there was no evidence to support the idea of a better performance with Piracetam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.25.132.99 (talk) 12:17, August 28, 2007 (UTC)


After reading this article on piracetam I almost wondered if they are talking about the same supplement i've read so much about. I see serious contradictions from other studies on the matter. to quote from another article on the net with far more research references, here are the contradictions that stuck out the most in my mind:

Piracetam is one of the safest drugs in existence. The literature reports no significant drug interactions, side effects, or serious idiosyncratic side effects [4]. These include measures of changes in heart rate and blood pressure, effects on other vital signs, tests of renal, hepatic, and hematological functions, and signs of sedation, tranquilization, locomotor stimulation, and psychodysleptic symptomatology [16]. In fact, in some trials, reports of side effects are higher in the placebo group than in the treated group [16]. In animal studies, rats have been given 1 g/kg orally for six months and 8 g/kg IV acutely, rats and mice have been given 10 g/kg orally, and dogs have been given 10 g/kg orally for one year; in all of these instances piracetam has been nontoxic [16, 29].

heres the url for this site: http://www.1fast400.com/?ingredients_id=41

the one aspect of this site i'm referencing that could be considered suspect is the fact they sell piracetam. its far more in depth though than the wiki article and far more references mentioned than the wiki article.

I would suggest simply trying it out ...

RSF: I agree with the above. I'm a medical student researching Piracetam for use in a possible study, and the peer-reviewed studies I'm finding (by people with no finacial interest in the drug) confirm the above; no adverse effects as compared to a control group. I'm going to grab a few of the best sources and edit the page, I think, unless someone wants to come forward with a citation for these adverse effects.

Later: Moving these here, substituting sourced studies:

The following effects have been reported:

Central and peripheral nervous system disorders: hyperkinesia (1.72 versus 0.42 %)

Metabolic and nutritional disorders: weight gain (1.29 versus 0.39 %)

Psychiatric disorders: nervousness (1.13 versus 0.25 %), somnolence (0.96 versus 0.25 %), depression (0.83 versus 0.21 %)

Body as a whole - general disorders: asthenia (0.23 versus 0.00 %)

Post-marketing experiences have reported the following undesirable effects:

Ear and labyrinth (inner ear) disorders: vertigo

Gastrointestinal disorders: abdominal pain, upper abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting

Immune system disorders: anaphylactoid reaction, hypersensitivity, multiple chemical sensitivity

Nervous system disorders: ataxia, impaired balance, aggravated epilepsy, headache, insomnia, somnolence

Psychiatric disorders: agitation, anxiety, confusion, hallucination

Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: angioneurotic oedema, dermatitis, pruritus, urticaria, rash

RSF: I've been adding references like a madman, trying to get to the point where one could lobby to have the "needs citations" label removed. A lot of the remaining, uncited assertions are dubious, though some are quite correct. Help, anyone?

[edit] Dubious paragraph moved here

-Enhances Brain Metabolism (By increasing Glucose Utilization,Blood & Oxygen Flow) [Boosts mental energy & cerebralcirculation].[citation needed]
-IncreasesCerebral Phospholipids & Cellular Membrane Fluidity (By interactingwith the polar head moieties of the phospholipid bilayer) [Supportshealthy neuron communication & structure].[citation needed]
-SupportsCognitive Receptors (By amplifying the density of the MuscarinicCholinergic [Frontal Cortex, Striatum, & Hippocampus], NMDA(N-Methyl-D-Aspartate) [Hippocampus], & AMPA(Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-Methyl-4-isoxazole-Propionic Acid) [CerebralCortex] Receptors) [Strengthens neurotransmitter receptors involved inmemory and neuroprotection].[citation needed]
-Stimulatesthe Corpus Callosum, an area of the brain that controls communicationbetween the left and right hemispheres (Increases communication betweenboth hemispheres) [Involved in speech and creative thinking].[citation needed]
Stimulates the Locus Coeruleus, (specialized neurons) [Involved ininformation processing, attention, cortical/behavioral arousal,learning and memory][citation needed]
-InhibitsPlatelet Aggregation (By increasing Red-White blood cells &Platelet deformability, inhibiting thromboxane A2 synthetase orantagonism of thromboxane A2, reducing von Willebrand's factor &fibrinogen levels) [Supports Healthy Blood Flow].[citation needed]
-DecreasesEEG complexity (Increases cooperatively of brain functional processing)[Positively effects Neuro-Electrical Functioning].[citation needed]
-Has a significant antioxidant effect.[citation needed]

Cacycle 20:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Warning

In the fall of 1995, I experimented with piracetam, taking the smallest of the three recommended dosages listed in Dean & Morganthaler's "Smart Drugs & Nutrients" on one occasion. After ingestion of the dose in the morning, I had an unpleasant experience which left me dizzy and disoriented later in the afternoon which passed in around one hour or so.

Approximately two weeks later, I consumed monosodium glutamate while eating a meal, a food additive which had never caused an unpleasant reaction for me prior to that day. Not long after consuming the MSG, I felt dizzy and had distortion in my field of vision.

Within the next month, I began to exhibit intolerance to a wide range of chemicals encountered in daily life, including acrylic, chemicals used in the manufacture of perfume & cologne, chemicals used in the manufacture of new carpeting, chemicals used in the manufacture of particle board, and other commonly encountered chemicals.

While I have minimized the effect of the chemical sensitivities over the course of the last decade through acupuncture and herbal medicine, I have not yet been able to bring about a complete cure.

While I have no empirical evidence that my chemicial sensitivities were caused by use of piracetam, there was no other chemical exposure or ingestion immediately prior to the onset of symptoms which could have caused the onset of my condition.

While I cannot say whether this undesirable side effect happens to one out of every 100 users or one out of every 100,000,000 users, it did happen to me. Like many people who tried piracetam, I had read literature which stated that piracetam causes absolutely no side effects and that it is an essentially harmless pharmaceutical. Be aware that even if the potential for chemical injury from the ingestion of piracetam is remote and highly unlikely to occur to any single user, development of multiple chemical sensitivities after ingestion of piracetam is a possibility and has happened to at least one person.

(To reply to a couple of points made in the subsequent entries, I had consumed MSG many times prior to ingesting piracetam and never experienced any ill effects. Furthermore, my reaction to MSG after my piracetam experience was just one of many negative reactions to a wide range of synthetic substances which I've had since ingesting piracetam.

Also, for what it's worth, the piracetam I took was purchased as a packaged, over-the-counter pharmaceutical in France, obtained at my request by a vacationing friend. I don't recall the brand name with certainty; it may have been Nootropil, but I'm not certain. 2/9/07)

24.128.218.134 00:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I respect your experience and I thank you for sharing it.

You admit, however, that you "have no empirical evidence . . . chemical sensitivities were caused by the use of piracetam."

Without empirical evidence, accusations of these kind should not be levelled, just as positive results in one person cannot stand as evidence of benefit. This is especially the case where there is an ample corpus of scientific research on the question.

I removed the phrase "Piracetam use has caused the development of multiple chemical sensitivities in some users." Before any one puts it back, I suggest they try to find more than one person who has experienced this correlation, and then report it as such, not as a cause-effect relationship. Let the reader draw their own conclusions on that, until there is scientific support for a causative relationship. My two cents.

I can personally vouch for the 'confusing' state when taking MSG. I ordered a chinese (I know my local uses MSG) whilst having the influence of 1600mg piracetam and 4,5g of hydergine already in me (spaced out in day). It made me feel very 'drowsy' and especially if I got up to quickly my brain experienced dizziness (for upto an entire minute) and it was so strong that i was trembling and stumbling over the vaccuum cleaner desperately trying to keep balance. My thoughts were quite confused (I seemed to have confused sleep deprived thought processes for a couple of hours). I ended up sleeping for an hour, then waking up for another half hour of confusion then fell asleep and ended up having the most VIVID AND WEIRDEST dreams possible. But this is the only side effect, and i haven't experienced the problem with other foods with MSG (as in regular food which uses very mild amounts). I have not had any other allergic responses, possibly amplifies previously unknown allergies? (The kind where you may not know you have an adverse reaction because it is not as noticeable as say a nut allergy for instance) --86.18.156.77 15:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


Individuals reporting side effects from piracetam should be aware that most of the bulk suppliers of piracetam in the United States resell untested powders from China which are often filled with contaminants. I bought and tested bulk powder from three different bulk nutrition suppliers in the united states and found all three to contain unacceptable levels of bacteria, metal, and fungus. Because it's completely uncontrolled in the united states, it should be purchased from a reputable source or from a pharmacy overseas.

I agree with the above editor- it cannot be understated how important it is to acquire anything you put into your body from a place you know you can trust. There are several legitimate suppliers that I know of for the United States, and some of the bizarre stories above make me thing that perhaps what they took was more than just Piracetam. Personally, I experienced increased focus and fluence, very mild lightheadedness, improved mood and (for some bizarre reason!) an urge to do work. It's only anecdotal, but certainly miles away from some of the above horror stories. --63.250.85.226 18:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] United States

The article claims that Piracetam is "not regulated in the United States (it is neither a controlled substance nor a prescription drug but instead sold as a dietary supplement)".

Is there a basis for a claim that Piracetam can be legally sold in the United States as a dietary supplement? I found a document on the FDA web site that states explicitly: "Piracetam is not a dietary supplement under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Moreover, the product appears to be a drug under the Act and thus subject to the regulatory requirements of drugs." It has not received FDA approval, so it's properly classified as an "unapproved new drug". At the very least, it's illegal to transport across state lines (21 USC section 355). --Itinerant1 01:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge sentences?

Shouldnt the sentence: "Furthermore, Piracetam may have an effect on NMDA glutamate receptors which are involved with learning and memory processes."

be merged with: "Finally, Piracetam may exert its global effect on brain neurotransmission via modulation of ion channels (i.e., Ca2+, K+)."

to create: "Furthermore, Piracetam may have an effect on NMDA glutamate receptors which are involved with learning and memory processes through its global (agonistic/ antagonistic?) effect on brain neurotransmission via modulation of ion channels (i.e., Ca2+, K+)."

as the two concepts are related?


-- First sentence pairings you listed should not be merged.


[edit] Side effects

I renamed "Undesirable effects" to "Side effects" because they are often desired. It's anecdotal, so no cite, but I, for one, know multiple 'racetam users who use primarily _because_ it potentiates alcohol and cannabis.

[edit] Last Paragraph is weasel-ish

The last paragraph seems to contradict the body. Removing it, as I think it's use as a nootropic has been sufficiently explained in the article's body. Reb42 00:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Effects on vertigo?

Did you have chance to evaluate the effects on vertigo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.175.231.66 (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Uncited information

I removed several bits of uncited information that appeared to have no realistic basis and appears to have been added by personal experience. I also pointed out sections that require references - I left the info because the basis for concerns are credible, but without references are questionable. If someone has this information, preferably the author, then cite the source. Otherwise the information is moot.Halogenated (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Intro

I made a few cutting edits to the intro, too many claims that were either not cited below or generally read as an advertisement for snake oil.Halogenated (talk) 04:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)