User:Piotrus/Talkheader

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This user wrote Kiev Offensive (1920), which is a good article.
This user wrote Polish legislative election, 1957, which is a good article.
This user wrote Poznań 1956 protests, which is a good article.
This user wrote Polish October, which is a good article.
This user wrote Kiev Expedition (1018), which is a good article.
This user wrote Polish culture during World War II, which is a good article.
This user wrote Łódź insurrection (1905), which is a good article.
This user wrote Minority Treaties, which is a good article.
This user wrote Smolensk War, which is an A-class article.
This user wrote Armia Krajowa, which is an A-class article.
This user wrote Max Weber, a featured article.
This user wrote Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, a featured article.
This user wrote Witold Pilecki, a featured article.
This user wrote Battle of Warsaw (1920), a featured article.
This user wrote Stanisław Koniecpolski, a featured article.
This user wrote Władysław Sikorski, a featured article.
This user wrote Polish-Soviet War, a featured article.
This user wrote May Constitution of Poland, a featured article.
This user wrote Polish September Campaign, a featured article.
This user wrote Sociocultural evolution, a featured article.
This user wrote History of Poland (1945-1989), a featured article.
This user wrote Polish-Muscovite War, a featured article.
This user wrote Katyń massacre, a featured article.
This user wrote History of Solidarity, a featured article.
This user wrote Soviet invasion of Poland (1939), a featured article.
This user wrote Józef Piłsudski, a featured article.
Cabal approved message

Image:Qxz-ad39.png Image:Qxz-ad20.gif

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Piotrus/Archive 24. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.
Archive

Talk archives: Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 April, 2008), add new

Reasons for my raising wikistress: Trolls are back :(
Reasons for my raising wikistress: Trolls are back :(
Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)
Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)

Contents

If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that I will either:

  • seek community approval of my adminship through an RfC; (no consensus = no change) or
  • choose to take the matter to ArbComm

at my discretion

  • once the "six editors in good standing" count has been met using my own criteria
  • and the matter concerns my admin powers rather than a non-admin editing concern.
  1. Remember, this is a voluntary action, and does not preclude an RfC or RfAr being initiated by others, should others feel they have no recourse.
  2. My "good standing" criteria include
a) the requirement that if the user is calling for recall is an admin, the admin must themselves have been in this category for at least a week.
b) the requirement that the user should be neutral towards my person. This means that if a user is or has been involved in a DR procedure with me as a party, I doubt that user is neutral and I reserve the right to not count this editor as "an editor in good standing" in this case. Hint: it's easy to find a neutral party, like mediators - if you can convince them you are right...
c) I reserve the right to impose additional criteria in the future.
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

[edit] Current RfAdminship

Username S O N S% Ending Possible duplicate voters
Ironholds 4 11 5 27% 16 June 2008 16:44 None Details
Epbr123 136 2 1 99% 11 June 2008 17:21 None Details
Tanthalas39 73 7 2 91% 10 June 2008 18:30 None Details

Last updated 21:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC) by Tangobot (maintained by Tangotango)