User talk:Pine oak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

--Pine oak 02:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

1 Hopeless failure
2 The Holocaust was real!
3 The Holocaust article
4 Iraqi Soldiers and Helicopter
5 Blocked

[edit] Hopeless failure

A tag has been placed on Hopeless failure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 02:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

It's Redirect vadelisum to 'Islam': deleat the link!--Pine oak 02:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree with the tag, the talk page has got a redirect vandalisum on it!--Pine oak 02:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC) (Redirected from Talk:Hopeless failure) I told the ater of this 'joke' it was not funny on there talk page.--Pine oak 02:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, then that is good. However, it appears that you were the creator of the page, an that is why the message has been directed at you. Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 02:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Please calm down. You are not in any trouble. I think I understand what you mean now - you looked up hopeless failure, and you discovered that it redirected to Islam. So you tried to fix it. Am I correct? Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 02:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

You are corect, I was trying to remove User: 86.25.48.144's prank [[1]] .--Pine oak 02:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iraqwarimage.jpg

[edit] The Holocaust was real!

The number of victims.

The Landsberg camp victims.

A cold water immersion experiment at Dachau concentration camp presided over by Professor Holzlohner (left) and Dr. Rascher (right). The victim is wearing a Luftwaffe garment.

The systamatic web of death and deceat.

'Slaughter' means-

1/ The intentional killing of an animal by humans or animals,

2/ The mass killing of animals by the forces of nature,

3/ The mass killing of humans by the forces of nature (as in a eathquake or flood),

4/ The inhuman, methodical and genosidal killing of humans by other humans (the Holocaust),

5/ The axidental or negligent killing of humans by other humans (man-slaughter).

predudical or non-predudical. It's all in the way the article is written as a whole, rather than the indervidual wourds used in it. Genoside and mass-murdur are equily aplicable to the topic to. Legaly speaking Genoside and mass-murdur are used in referance to it.--Freetown 05:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Holocaust article

You appear to have weighed in on issues with The Holocaust's article before, can you weigh in on the use of the word 'slaughter,' as seen here? —Parhamr 10:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, slaughter can be used to refer to humans—but it is colloquial and pejorative as used in literature. That is the issue here; genocide is internationally recognized and established and even comes directly from post-WWII findings. —Parhamr 05:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

It sounds like we agree—genocide would be a much more appropriate term, mass-murder even. Can you reply to this? —Parhamr 05:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[[2]]--86.29.255.39 02:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Iraqi Soldiers and Helicopter

Would you support using that image? You seemed to have a top preference for the HMMV and Helicopter image, but this does not display any humans, which is something we are all really looking for. The Iraqi soldier image, on the other hand, does show humans, and Iraqis at that, which makes it really preferable. ~Rangeley (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, I do support the use of the 'The Iraqi soldier image' picture.--Pine oak 00:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Blocked as a sock of a troll who has exhibited similar behaviors in hundreds of accounts for the past few months. Academic Challenger 07:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)