User talk:Pinay06

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user assumes good faith.

Respect

Respect other people's views!

Archives

/Archive 1/Archive 2/Archive 3

Pinay06

Hello! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

[edit] The Boxing Day

I observed it myself. I am in Indonesia, at Jakarta. The connection Timed Out at 26-28 December to this enormous site and all sites I've usually visited. Thank God there were improvements at 29 December. (It's 30 December now in my time). I was able to visit Wikipedia and Yahoo! Search, but I couldn't visit Google. UTC 18.24 29 Dec 06 Marhadiasa.

[edit] From Fro

Ahaaah, so here's how to use this; I'm still learning. Please bear with me, Pinay. I guess you keep tab of my IP ad heheh. (Fro)

[edit] Philippine Tarsier Foundation GA hold

This is on GA hold for 7 days for: needs more refs (ex: all of background only has one), refs are not consitently formatted, not enough wikilinks. Sumoeagle179 23:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Failed GA, no action taken.Sumoeagle179 23:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I am getting/working on the citations and have them offline, and isn't the 7th day on the 28th yet? Please re consider. Thank you. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 04:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

It was only about one hour from that day and no action had been taken and I had no reason to expect any. If you address the issues, renominate it and let me know and I'll expedite it.Sumoeagle179 10:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Your statement - "I had no reason to expect any" is very very low, and subjective for a fellow Wikipedian of stature! After having put so much time and effort into this article, any additional time for me is immaterial. Besides, I had to make sure everything is covered from my end, so as not to compromise the value and integrity of the article. Please look into my list of GAs in my userpage to understand me and how I work! In addition, in Wikipedia, we do not assume the negative! We always abide by WP:AGF. BTW, FYI, I am not re-nominating this yet. I have submitted this for WP:GA/R, just so you know. I hope you do not do the same thing to other well-meaning wikipedians next time. What I am trying to say is check the credentials or credibility of the major contributor first before you use the axe! Thank you for your time. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 18:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

You should assume good faith also, with no response after over 6 days, I stand by my statement.Sumoeagle179 18:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

BTW, GA/R takes longer than an expedited renom.Sumoeagle179 18:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up. Sorry for the miscommunication. or the failure to communicate. I simply had so much in both RL and WL. Maybe i will take you up on your offer of the renom, if I can drag myself our of the depression of the failed GA. I will let you know before the week ends. It's just that I owe it to Bohol and its people to make this article WP:GA, which is my hope for all others in Portal:Bohol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pinay06 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 1 March 2007 (U

[edit] Hey

I'm visiting Bohol this summer. Any suggestions what places or sights I must go to aside from Chocolate Hills and Tarsiers? Berserkerz Crit 10:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Of course. It depends on what you feel like doing? snorkelling, kayaking, river cruise, mountain climbing, spelunking, sleeping, ballroom dancing, sing along, chatting, shopping, antiques. etc...anything! and whatever you like. Send me an email I will send you pics of the places you can go to: Panglao Island is a must, dolphin/whale watching, Pamilacan island, Balicasag island, Hinagdanan caves, well read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Bohol. Let me know if you need help with hotel reservations as well as a good tourist guide or what! But we can arrange it ourselves. I can give you a suggested one...Also a good personal guide...pili ka lang: student o teacher, congressman o gov? hehehehehe --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 07:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Me and my family (for a total of five) are staying in the Bohol Beach Club (ata, san bang city to?) for 4 days and 3 nights. So I guess aside from the Chocolate Hills and Tarsiers, we only have our sched free for one more activity (kasi gusto ng mama at ate ko mag shopping or tingin tingin lang around hehe). Snorkeling, kayaking, river cruise, mountain climbing, spelunking, sleeping (wat da hehe) are definitely out of the question from my family's type of activities. So I guess good places for shopping and obtaining Bohol-exclusive items. Congressman wahaha bigtime wag na nid siguro nun mangampanya hehe. Berserkerz Crit 12:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

First of all, what are the specific dates? Holy Week? BBC is the best choice! You couldn't be in any other paradise! It is in Panglao town of Panglao Island. Please note that the owner of BBC, Anos Fonacier, is also the one of the top guys of the Philippine Tarsier Foundation. So, make sure you get in contact with him, too. So, are you doing the Chocolate Hills and Philippine Tarsier by yourself? The BBC can arrange the site visits for you, but will entail additional expense. If it is not Holy Week, I can arrange for some cool guys and gals (?) to meet you and take you around for a special feel of our island nation hehehe, as well as a taste of night life Bohol-style. (Let me know age-range preferences! hehehe I am serious!). Well, it wouldn't hurt to say Hi to the congressmen, even through txt messages. (Email me for specific details!). As for the shops, they are all over the place! The cheap ones will be in the old Torralba market, the Cogon Market, Agora and Dao (Satellite City) markets. There are also souvenir shops outside of the Hinagdanan cave, as well as along the Loboc River (Cruise) and Chocolate hills, but understandably with marked up touristy prices. The new and modern mall is the Island City Mall. Pics are in the article on Bohol. Let me hear from you more... --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 07:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kagwang

Sige ate tignan ko kung maasikaso ko yung article. May naglagay yata nang drawing lang ng kagwang pero hindi siya okey para sakin. kaka-submit ko lang ng first draft ng thesis ko at ngayon ko malalaman kung okay na siya (wag naman sanang paulitin sa kin yun) ----Lenticel 01:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA na pala ang Eskaya

I award you this exceptional antique barnstar from Andres Bonifacio's shed for getting Eskaya to GA status and improving plenty of Philippine-related articles. Berserkerz Crit 12:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I'm back

Ooooh, vacation was so nice. I thoroughly enjoyed being able to spend time with my parents again. We decided not to make the trip to Paquime, though, since that would have been eight hours of driving on the day after we had travelled thirteen hours. I've been back for a couple of weeks but have been very busy with a side project that is consuming a lot of my time. Wikipedia has been calling my name, though, so I'll try to steal some time here and there to edit. I see you've stayed busy all this time. How is the work with the legislature progressing concerning the images? SWAdair | Talk 05:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Hi Pinay06! I've done a little contribution in the article of Bohol. I think the grammar will be quite bad. Revise that if it's badly written. Bye. Miguel303xm 15:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] controversial quotes

Message for Titopao: Any idea how we should respond to this? I am still stalling heheheh! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 17:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Posted a response at the talk page. You're in for a huuuge surprise ;) Btw, I'll email you the long-overdue homework (LoL) before the week ends. --- Tito Pao 06:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Paring Bol-anon

I've nominated Paring Bol-anon, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Paring Bol-anon satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paring Bol-anon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Paring Bol-anon during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.RJASE1 ^Talk 06:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

On a quick note (without reading your comments in the article talk page, etc. then on the same note - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Honolulu_-_Clergy should also be AfD nominated? For consistency, that is. Otherwise I'd say that the nomination is purely and simply subjective and/or condescending..Also, which particular portion of Wikipedia policy does it say that these two articles are both unencyclopedic? --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up - I'll nominate that article for deletion also. I cited the particular policies I was concerned about in the AfD nomination. Salamat... RJASE1 ^Talk 08:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Going back to December of 2006, I wish the second one had already been AfD nominated! Then we would have been spared of all the long hours and calls to different parts of the world to track all these people down...Perhaps you would re-consider and nominate to move the article to List of Paring Bol-anon (currently a redirect) linked to the Diocese of Tagbilaran and/or Bohol articles? Also the Immaculate Heart of Mary Seminary. It really is such a waste of time, energy, people, long distance calls, internet time, etc! just to have the article just deleted like that! Note: I still have not gone to the Talk page yet! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I would definitely take your argument to the AfD pages of the affected articles... RJASE1 ^Talk 09:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmmmm...Well, thank you for the heads up! I will check out the talk page now, or maybe later. My spirits are dampened now! BTW, how do you know salamat? My answer will be "walang anuman pero masakit pa rin! kahit papaano"! hehehe --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

LOL - My wife is from Lunsod ng Cebu, and we've been married for 20 years, so I know a little Tagalog. Nothing personal, I just don't think this particular list is right for Wikipedia - maybe a category for the notable people in the list? Otherwise I think it will be impossible to maintain. RJASE1 ^Talk 09:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

LoL! Why don't I make it painless by tagging it {{db-author}} now? Perhaps this will be more appreciated and in place in the Cebuano wikipedia. yes? --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Opo - maraming salamat! Let me know if there's ever anything I can do for you...Timyong RJASE1 ^Talk 09:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Okey! I will tag it {{db-author}} tomorrow after many of the Paring Bol-anon have seen the tag! Btw, okey lang. Baka mas masaya sila sa Cebuano Wikipedia. Although many of them are in the U.S. etc na. Anyways, share Portal:Bohol with your wife. Maybe she will inspire you to do Portal:Cebu, or both of you tour Bohol...Let me know. That will be interesting.--Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

BTW, Cebu is just 1 1/2 hours away from Bohol by fastcraft! Just FYI! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

It's funny - just last night I had a conversation with a Pinay on my talk page here... RJASE1 http://ceb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paring_Bol-anon^Talk 09:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm...sa title pa lang, nakakahiya na! naku! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

BTW, check wiki email. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Oo, walang hiya.... :). I'll check mail, thanks. RJASE1 ^Talk 09:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

O, BTW, the link to the Cebuano wikipedia entry is this! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Kumusta, Ate...I would just let the AfD run its course, no need for a speedy deletion. RJASE1 ^Talk 00:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What is this?

How is this going to help anything? I'm merely pointing out that Filipinos are not a related ethnic group to Hispanics. That is all. Than k You. Cali567 06:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] learned something?

All I've learned is that you think you have all the power in the world to talk/write to me as if I were a kid...Relax and enjoy life, don't let the fact that Filipinos are not related to Hispanics get you down..K? Cali567 19:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

hahahaha! I did not even think nor do I care if Filipinos are not related to Hispanics. I am just pointing the Wikipedia policies that apply to your edit/s. hehehe As for my WL? it couldn't be better! While my RL is very outstanding! I live in a wonderful world! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 21:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Danao/Dagohoy/Inabanga

Sirs/Madam, In one of your history version of Danao it was said that Danao was once a barrio of Talibon. If this is the case how come that the famous Francisco Dagohoy was an Inabangnon or from Inabanga, as Philippine history states and a very accepted fact, if Dagohoy was born in Danao and Danao was formerly part of Talibon ? Is it not that Danao was once a part of Inabanga and not Talibon and that Dagohoy was not born in Danao. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.213.76.209 (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] just a sharing

FYI, pls read this --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 06:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Um...okay, so...pinag-usapan na natin 'to, di ba? In one of the phone conversations, that is. Di ba sabi ko sa yo noon, hayaan mo na lang? I'll be posting a more comprehensive response on his talk page later, but I'd want to see how the two of you will get to resolve this on your own. --- Tito Pao 01:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

And, no, unlike you, I do not intend to place them on comments ;-) --- Tito Pao 01:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi ate!

Napasa ko na bound thesis ko! Kayo po kumusta na. Alam kong maraming haggard na prof at students ngayon. May eyebags na rin nga yung eyebags ko eh. Sana ay hindi kayo masyadong stressed out.

Anyways I could now devote more energy to Wikipedia. Maybe after the Holy Week we could work on Phil. endemic creature articles (Kagwang?). Ate you could check out the Tamaraw article which Shrumster and I are pushing to GA status. Basically we only lack pictures and a few citations but I think its GA worthy.--Lenticel 01:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Philippine blogs awards night

Before anything else. Thanks for the comments and help with the tamaraw article. Sensysa po pero meron po yatang gimik yung lahat kaming magka-batch sa weekend. This weekend lang kasi kami pwedeng mag-relax. (bawal next week kasi Holy Week). --Lenticel 23:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

And yes, you DO deserve it, after all the hard work! I remember all the overnight in Mactan Island we had, after every major Bio test! hehehehe! Those were my UP Bio days. nakakamiss din. So, enjoy mo while you are in it! Ingat din. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 03:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PGMA Talk page

You won't believe how some people are so hardheaded:

Talk:Gloria_Macapagal-Arroyo#To_those_who_insist_on_discussing_the_.2Asubject.2A_instead_of_the_.2Aarticle.2A

If they still don't get it after this, then I don't know what. I-report ko na kaya sa admin? --- Tito Pao 06:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

It is always good to already include the admin at the start, for easy contexting later. hehehe...-Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] how do I send you my pics

I need help, says your email address is not working.

I wrote to you before regarding pictures I have of Inabanga.

Stew —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stew.alexander.inbox (talk • contribs) 06:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC).

You may follow the instructions here as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fielsvd#ANSWERS_TO_QUESTIONS--Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, this is my first time use with wikipedia. No malice intended. Im removing the changes I made to Bohol entry, but I was not the one who edited or made "vandalism" with the Holy Name University.

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bohollogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bohollogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bohollogo.jpg

Hello, Pinay06. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bohollogo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Pinay06/Places. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Citilogo.gif

Hello, Pinay06. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Citilogo.gif) was found at the following location: User:Pinay06/Contributions. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please support to retain the quick counts

Vote Disagree and for more supporters please rizalninoynapoleon 20:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Go to Talk:Philippine general election, 2007 immediately

[edit] Eto...

...The Tambayan decided that it was about time for a meet-up (and naturally, those who showed up were also talking about each other and the other editors, you included ;) There was also a ruckus at the Tambayan over another editor claiming that a Senator contacted him about the Philippine general elections, 2007 article, which turned out to be a fake (read all the sordid details at the talk page of the Tambayan...hehehehehe ;-) Cheers --- Tito Pao 03:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Alburlogo2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alburlogo2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:LCC-group.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:LCC-group.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. bluemask ^(talk) 16:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:24massescover.jpg

I have tagged Image:24massescover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Bishopyiet.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bishopyiet.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tamaraw up for review

Hi Ate!

I submitted tamaraw article for a review. content-wise it is ok although more data will be helpful. What we sorely lack are pictures.--Lenticel ^(talk) 06:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prguingona.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Prguingona.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Choruspaulinus.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Choruspaulinus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MassOfStRita.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MassOfStRita.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An edit long ago

While this edit was a long time ago, I expect you to not add things like this in articles anymore. — Save_Us_229 06:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:RyanCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RyanCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kantada sa Semana Santa 1 413 x 600 .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kantada sa Semana Santa 1 413 x 600 .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:SHADOWbook.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SHADOWbook.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SPOTtapecover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SPOTtapecover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:DearJesusAlbum Lungay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DearJesusAlbum Lungay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dagohoy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dagohoy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LCC-CD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LCC-CD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matthew-25-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew-25-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vfalogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vfalogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dwuflogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dwuflogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HSSlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:HSSlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User Neworleans

A tag has been placed on Template:User Neworleans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tagalog Wikipedia

Tagalog Wikipedia Campaign March 2008!

Tagalog Wikipedia is campaigning for your participation in writing, editing, assessing and translating articles!
The purpose of this campaign is to expand and improve articles at Tagalog Wikipedia. Your participation will be highly appreciated by the community.

There are over 16,000 articles to view, read, review, edit, and expand, so please visit the Wikipedia Café and the WikiProject Philippines at Tagalog Wikipedia to help out!

The campaign includes seeking your assistance in:

• Providing requested pages
• Providing requested articles
• Providing articles required for all language Wikipedias
• Starting or improving pages that need translation

Or just anything you can do to help us just like what you are doing there at the English Wikipedia.

Thank you in advance and regards, Tagalog Wikipedia Community

Finally, Wikipedia is the 7^th most visited site in the Philippines. Then why is it that the Tagalog Wikipedia, the Wikipedia in your own language remains unknown to most of the Filipinos? The mission of this campaign is to change that. Will you join us?

[edit] Image:Let me follow.jpg

I have tagged Image:Let me follow.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Ditto for Image:Let me follow.jpg, Image:ChopaSLO.jpg, Image:SPOT2cover.jpg, Image:Choruspaulinus.jpg and Image:Kantada sa Semana Santa 3 600 x 572 .jpg. --Geniac (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bohol Floral - orchids

Hello Pinay, I had a look on your pictures from the flora of Bohol and others. I can identify some of the plants (at least the genus)
Flora Bohol 5: Dendrobium, probably a hybrid
Flora Bohol 6: I'm not use, Cattleya alliance, but I have no further idea
Flora Bohol 7: Phalaenopsis aphrodite
Flora Bohol 8: Dendrobium, probably a hybrid
Flora Bohol 9: Dendrobium, probably a hybrid
Flora Bohol 10: Spathoglottis hybrid
Orchid 2: Dendrobium bigibbum or hybrid with bigibbum
Dendrobium.jpg: Dendrobium bigibbum or hybrid with bigibbum'
Regards --Toapel (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) de:user:Toapel

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Cebulogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cebulogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bagongbuwan.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bagongbuwan.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:PTFI Board.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PTFI Board.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sandugo2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sandugo2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)