Talk:Pinoy rock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Pinoy rock is within the scope of WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Death by Stereo
Is Death by Stereo a Pinoy rock band? Or there is Pinoy rock band that has the same name? --Jojit fb 05:45, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, there is a band named Death By Stereo, headed by Jerome Abalos. They are still active in the scene every now and then.
perhaps they've same names, kinda like Chicosci and South America's Chico Science. and Manila's Pupil and Pupil from Denmark... Magasin 00:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pinoy rock or Pinoy Rock?
What is approriate? Pinoy rock or Pinoy Rock? Other articles in Wikipedia doesn't capitalize it, like Pop rock, Alternative rock etc. I think that we should follow the standard. --Jojit fb 04:40, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 60's & 70's Bands correct names:
Correct/Incorrect: Anak ng Bayan/Anakbayan; Juan de la Cruz/Juan de la Cruz Band; Heber at ang Banyhuhay/Banyuhay
Don't get me wrong, I'm only in my 20s. -AYBABTU
== Where's DZRJ? == (January 2, 2006)
A glaring mistake in the author's history is that DZRJ, The Rock Of Manila, is not given any credit or mention at all in this. DZRJ was the central figure in the evolution of Pinoy Rock, and this mistake is a discredit to WIKIPEDIA. Having been a part of that history, I could fill in the blanks. But I will leave it to the author concerned the chance to correct himself. - BOB MAGOO <bobbluesmagoo@yahoo.com> <http://therockofmanila.com>
- It's not "a discredit to Wikipedia". Wikipedia articles are only the sum of all of the edits made by members. If you haven't taken the trouble of adding a section on DZRJ don't expect there to be one. Maybe you should take a crack at it - you'd probably do all right. :) 203.131.167.26 00:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dongabay
Fixed a POV mentioning the "genius of Filipino songwriting" on the Dongabay album. I agree (it's a great album), but if you can find anything better (and not POV) than "laid-back optimism" feel free to re-edit.
[edit] Greatest 50 rock bands
I removed it since it had no refs. --Howard the Duck 08:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pin Up Girls
No offense to Mondo but why an entire paragraph on Pin-up Girls, while more influential bands like Sandwich and Rivermaya only share a paragraph?Clubdredd 04:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DJ Ro
No offense to DJ Ro, but did his stint at Gweilos really make an impact on Pinoy Rock? Just asking. Perhaps the author needs to verify this further.Clubdredd 04:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clean up
This article needs to be cleaned up bad. Most of the bands mentioned aren't even notable enough to be included here. --Pnoise 07:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
also needs clean-up on links and artist names etc. especially dates/timeline and contributions of artists. well, we'll work on that Magasin 01:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has degenerated into one blatant venue for advertisement, especially for some bands who have no notable achievements whatsoever, therefore not worth mentioning. Since no one seems to have the initiative to step up, I will start the article clean up. Most important would be the issue of including bands of "notable" status. Since I want to make this pretty much democratic, I will put up a separate list of bands in question. If anyone has anything to say about any particular band's notability (and not just "doing gigs" or "has played with so and so" or "has been included in so and so album"), then post an argument there on why they should be included. Ok, will start clean up now. Let's make this article as clean as possible. Remember, the whole world's looking at this, we don't want them to see how cluttered and self-serving we could be (if only, for the Pinoy Rock genre.) --Pnoise 09:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok, started clean up. Wrote everything so they are more or less on the same writing style. Some explanations for the edited items:
- What exactly is the notability of The Numeric Sampler album when during that time, a lot of compilation albums have already been released? Edited that out, until further explanation/ justification. Along with this, bands under that sampler are edited out, until further justification as to why they should be included.
- Too much emphasis on goth. Not equal with all other genre entries. enough to say that there is underground following, apart from more mainstream genres. Left the more prominent bands. The following are questionable, until further justification that they're notable enough to be included: Skies of Ember, DaydreamCycle, Inflikt, Scarlet Tears, Sea of Rains, The Late Isabel, The Slave Drum, Elemento and Decay Transit. Remember, we want this article to be a comprehensive resource on Pinoy Rock, not as a venue for production advertisement.
- Edited out revitalized metal scene. In the first place, were they ever away? Probably needs a better-written entry on underground metal. And the more prominent bands, not just the ones included in recent productions. Again, remember, we want this article to be a comprehensive resource on Pinoy Rock, not as a venue for production advertisement.
- Edited out punk scene. Someone write a better written punk rock entry please. As well as the more prominent bands, not just the ones who are always included in the so called productions. As always, remember, we want this article to be a comprehensive resource on Pinoy Rock, not as a venue for production or band advertisement.
There. This is work in progress, so let us all make this work and set aside personal agendas. Pinoy Rock forever. --Pnoise 13:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RJ & The Riots LP.jpg
Image:RJ & The Riots LP.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Maria cafra logo.PNG
Image:Maria cafra logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:DZRJ.gif
The image Image:DZRJ.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
