Talk:Pinocchio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Merge with Pinocchio (Shrek)

It was previously suggested that Pinocchio (Shrek) be merged into the article about The Adventures of Pinocchio which didn't make a lot of sense since that was primarily about the book, not the character. However, it would make sense to include information in this article (about the character) about all of the notable appearances of Pinocchio, including the canonical version in the book, the popular version in the Disney cartoon... and the Shrek version. This is being done with other fictional characters (e.g. Peter Pan). - JasonAQuest (talk) 15:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

  • I think you shouldn't merge the articles because the Shrek version is totally different from the original version. -ComputerGuy890100 (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
    • So, he's not a walking, talking, wooden puppet boy? - JasonAQuest (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Support - Merge away, the shrek article is not notable on its own. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BMG Pinnochio.jpg

Image:BMG Pinnochio.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

It has a rationale now. Does this new rationale lack anything? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 17:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)