Talk:Pink (Victoria's Secret)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.
Fashion WikiProject This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks!
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance within fashion.
It is requested that one or more images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

What's the deal with these ad spam delete messages? Per the Advertising page, this is a legitimate page, that just needs expansion.


"However, a differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities."

Jholiiday 15:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not to be confused with...

If this article survives WP:CSD, then mention should be made that this is not the same as Thomas Pink clothing stores. --StuffOfInterest 14:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ad

I think the last paragraph needs to be rewritten. I sounds like an advertisement.

THIS IMAGE IS VERY GOOD BUT IF U TRY TO USE IT AS UR BACKGROUND ON UR COMPUTER IT WILL STRECH AND LOOK BLURY:[ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.185.68.141 (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)