Talk:Pinarayi Vijayan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
	This article is maintained by the Kerala workgroup.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: Being a vowed atheist, can Vijayan's religion be mentioned "Hindu"? (edit)

It has been noticed that this article is being edited frequently to remove negative remarks against this politician, if any. Articles in Wikipedia should be neutral and informative on all aspects of the subjects. So it is important to mention facts and events related to this politician regardless of they being positive or negative. Please help to keep Wikipedia informative and unbiased!

Jojukavalan 08:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Adhere to Wiki Guideline 2 Revert war 3 Citations for the suspension decision 4 Link Vandalism? 5 BLP 6 Blpdispute tag, after re-writing

[edit] Adhere to Wiki Guideline

One of the basic tenet of wikipedia is the verifiability of the source .To state something as POV here is seen as totaly based on the view point of the particular editor.In this context verifiable points about the article, deserves it legitimate space irrespective of the fact that the same appears as negative characterisation for a section of editors. Do conceive that Wiki is open to everyone who follows its polcies for entry.

By referring a Partisan source (People democarcy) the editor has violated verifiabily policy as well as Wiki NPOV policy.--Sahyadhri 15:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revert war

Please discuss the disagreements in the talk page. `'Míkka 04:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citations for the suspension decision

Here are some references for the decision to suspend Mr. Vijayan from politburo.
1, VS, Vijayan out of CPM politburo
2, Authority at stake, CPM Politburo suspends Kerala CM & bitter rival
3, Comrades still out
4, CPIM Press Communique

202.68.145.230 05:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The following para appearing in the article is utterlly pov and need to be deleted. This page seems to be the other side of proxy war mounted by M.N. Vijayan and V.S. Achuthanandan editors. Kerala partisanal editors, please keep your fights to the streets of Kerala and not on Wiki pages.

As a reformist he is facing challenges from inside and outside the party and is beging targeted and wrongly projected by the media in Kerala. The SNC Lavalin controversy in Kerala is said to be another example of public controversies hatched and fanned up by an anti-party clique primarily operating within the mass media in collusion with the UDF leaders.The vigilance inquiry,in which even after hectic efforts,no evidence was found against Pinarayi Vijayan. However, on 16th January 2007, Kerala High court

Weblogan 15:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Link Vandalism?

External link to this article, SNC LAVALIN Controversy, is actually a piece written in the Communist Party magazine; as such, it is not neutral nor is it pretending to be neutral. It is meant mainly for their cadres. i suggest this to be deleted. Weblogan 14:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BLP

Saying someone has amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income without an ironclad citation is an invitation to libel -- can potentially put Wikiproject in jeopardy.Weblogan (talk) 08:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Another example of defamatory statement --about living person's connection with mafia-- had been undoneWeblogan (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blpdispute tag, after re-writing

I've removed unsourced or poorly sourced 'Blpdispute' tag after available references cited and re-written the article. I don't find any copyvio at articles this stage. I cross checked controversies section with references. In my opinion, everything is ok as of now. Thank you.
--Avinesh Jose  T  11:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)