User talk:Pikipiki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] A welcome from Emersoni
Hello, Pikipiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia!
Emersoni 05:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AFD
Why did you create Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation to Support Animal Protection? There is no article by the name Foundation to Support Animal Protection, nor has it ever existed. JFW | T@lk 23:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Also, please do not edit other peoples' comments on talk pages such as on Talk:Rebbe[1]. JFW | T@lk 23:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Metzitzah
Hi, it’s me bloger:
Thank you, very much for editing the addition by me in the article. You’ve done a superb job.
And sorry I didn’t realize until now that you helped, or else I would have thanked you earlier
Thank you again
Bloger 22:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chofetz Chaim
There is no reliable and verifiable source I know of for the "Poupko" claim, so it cannot be added. -- Avi 03:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Herpes-Neonatal herpes
Please do not revert my edits. I will post sources over the next week or so. Those in the know, know I know. Thank you. pikipiki 18:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brit milah
Hi. I have reverted your most recent edit from Brit Milah. Please review Wikipedia's no original research policy. Wikipedia does not publish original research (OR) or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions or experiences. If you wish to argue that whatever testing the NYS did or did not do is "curious" or that the impetus behind the protocol is "misunderstood" you need to provide direct citations from a reliable source to that effect. We are here to write an encyclopedia, not to provide the Opinions Of Wikipedia Editors. A lot of new editors don't understand some of our content policies, so it is a common mistake. Don't take it personally. Regards, Nandesuka (talk) 13:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Herpes simplex
Hi there, please feel free to add any useful info to the herpes simplex page that you feel is missing - and, yes, please do add all relevant references that you have, it will make life so much easier when we start pushing towards WP:FAR. The drug stuff I am less familiar with, so would appreciate an expert coming in to help. As far as the neonatal herpes is concerned, I think the section is getting really large, and wouldn't want to expand it on the main herpes simplex article, but it may warrant a page of its own if you think you have much more information to add - then we could reduce the section on the main article with a link to a neonatal herpes page - what do you think? ~ Ciar ~ (Talk to me!) 00:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again, I just wanted to let you know there is a discussion being held with the individual that removed the risk factor data to see if we can come to some consensus over how the offending sentence could be worded instead of having an edit war flare up. I moved it (from Nbauman's talk page) to the herpes simplex talk page for others to contribute to the discussion. My thinking is, if the information can be misinterpreted/misunderstood in any way, maybe we can improve the wording to make it easier - not everyone is familiar with risk factors and what they mean, I guess. All the best, ~ Ciar ~ (Talk to me!) 14:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)