User talk:PikDig/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contents |
Philippine Airlines
Well I guess your right…. i understand .tnx
Recent Attempted Move of Charrrmed (Charmed episode)
Hi there. You recently attempted to correct the title of this page. Unfortunately, you tried to copy/paste the article to the new title instead of using the move function. Pages cannot simply be copy/pasted, because that destroys the edit history of the article. The article will be placed on Wikipedia:Requested moves in order to get it to the correct name. I redirected the new article back to the current title until the move can be completed properly. Please don't change the redirect until this is sorted out. Thanks. —MiraLuka 03:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Northwest Airlines
Northwest Airlines uses a spoke-hub system for its flights within the U.S., as you well know. It obviously extends this system outside the U.S., as you indicated to your edits to Newark Liberty International Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport, among others. But these "international" flights are transcontinental flights that do not extend too far from the U.S. It is not unreasonable to say that your "international" flights are merely extensions of the U.S. domestic system for Northwest.
Also, as I pointed out at Talk:Newark Liberty International Airport#Edmonton?, your "direct" flights may not connect. Why would you list a 1-stop flight that would not connect at that one stop? Today, look up yesterday's (July 27) flight status of flight 1019 at nwa.com. Had the flight been direct, at Minneapolis, passengers from Newark would be guaranteed a connection at Minneapolis to go to Edmonton. Am I right or am I wrong? And, anyway, it just seems to be a coincidence that there is such a flight number from Newark to Edmonton. There is no direct flight from Edmonton to Newark, would you agree?
I'm not a member of the Wikiproject Airports, but I know from common sense when a destination should be listed and when one should not. I'm not going to revert your edits yet. Tinlinkin 12:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Narnia
Hello, I noticed that you edited an article related to, or expressed interest in The Chronicles of Narnia. I thought you may be interested in knowing that there is a WikiProject working to improve articles about Narnia, your help would be greatly appreciated. Please consider joining the WikiProject Narnia. Thank you! Bornagain4 18:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
RE: Transporation on Singapore Wikimania bid
Hello, its great that you would like to help. Just send me an email or drop a note on my talk page. Do it quick though. Thanks :) --Terence Ong (T | C) 09:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: parentheses vs. brackets
We've used brackets traditionally to set apart "seasonal" and start dates so as not to present confusing subsets of parentheses. Any reason you changed it? FCYTravis 06:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Newark International Airport
I have reverted your edit to Newark International Airport because all of your changes are not compliant with the style for Wikipedia Airport Pages. NcSchu 15:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
go!Express
I noticed that you changed the Honolulu International Airport, Kahului Airport, and other Hawaii airport articles to reflect Mokulele Airlines flights as go!Express. While Mokulele's site lists go! flights, the Mokulele flights don't appear bookable on go!'s site yet and their PDF timetable also doesn't reflect the go!Express flights. Until there is some indication that the service has actually started, I don't think we should be listing Mokulele flights as go!Express. -- Hawaiian717 16:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
