User talk:Pieboyjr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] London

Your recent edit to London was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:51, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Local councillors

Hi. Just to let you know that I've labelled a few of your councillor articles for deletion. To quality as notable for the purposes of Wikipedia, living people should be the criteria at WP:BIO. With politicians, it is:

• Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature.
• Major local political figures who receive significant press coverage

Local councillors do not meet the first criterion and are unlikely to meet the second. To avoid deletion if the second does apply, the article should make clear how the criterion is met. Cheers. —Whouk (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

PS: Short articles should be labelled as stubs so that other editors can find them to expand them. It's also useful to categorise articles. Happy editing! —Whouk (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

See WP:Stub for details. In this case, you would add:

{{UK-politician-stub}}

at the bottom of the article. By the way, to sign a message on a talk page, use four tildes: ~~~~. Cheers. —Whouk (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for not replying sooner - my browser crashed last time I tried. I'm not an administrator so I can't delete articles. They might not be deleted but redirected to the council article as most councillors do not warrant their own articles, as per the guideline at WP:BIO (there are lots of policies about what's considered notable for Wikipedia - you get used to them eventually!). Cheers. —Whouk (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your unexplained edit

Dear Pieboyjr, You didn't explain your last edit on this page, so I have revereted it. Myrtone

[edit] Football AID 9 July - 16 July

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

FA Premier League has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Youth voice fm.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Youth voice fm.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:NTCColLargeComp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NTCColLargeComp.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tables

You seem to be having a lot of trouble editing the table on English football league system - can I help at all....? ChrisTheDude 13:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Stpauls.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stpauls.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] North Tyneside elections

Nice work on the different North Tyneside elections pages you have created. One point however on the North Tyneside Council election 2008 and I think in the intro of several of the other articles you have got that the whole council will be up for election. This is incorrect the whole council is up for election only about once a decade after the boundary changes which for North Tyneside was 2004. This link [1] shows what elections will be taking place in 2008 which is only one third of the council. Davewild 08:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I have amended the intro on each of the articles - not sure if the wording is perfect, have a look what you think, but it seems to be about right. Davewild 17:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Stpaulswhitleybay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stpaulswhitleybay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 03:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)