Talk:Piers Lauder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Baronetcies.

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2007. The result of the discussion was Merge and redirect.

The sources are given. There is nothing in the article so far (March 2007) that cannot be found in the public domain. I don't know if he yet has professor status but he is heading in that direction if he has not. He has been a university lecturer and researcher for over 25 years and one of his computer programmes is used by the Australian Ministry of defence. I would say that he is a fairly important fellow. His baronetcy adds to that. David Lauder 16:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Name of this article

Shouldnt this article be called Piers Lauder?--Vintagekits 17:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Move

See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:

Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.

I am moving this page.--padraig 11:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)