Talk:Pierre Mailloux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This page was previously listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. With new information, the nominator rescinded its nomination, and the result of the vote was to keep. You may view an archive of the vote at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pierre Mailloux. Samaritan 16:13, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Not true

On September 25 he cited studies used at the University of Montréal (Université de Montréal in French) in psycho-education classes on Tout le monde en parle that black people in the united states and native american people had lower IQ in average, a currently controversial topic of study about race and intelligence.

Guy A lepage cited this, not Doc mailloux, read french version of this article

from [1]

Anecdote

Lors de l'émission télévisée Tout le monde en parle (diffusée le 25 septembre 2005, voir lien ci-dessous), Guy A. Lepage cite une déclaration controversée que Doc Mailloux a faite 3 ans auparavant à propos d'une étude américaine touchant les Noirs d'Amérique du Nord, relativement aux conséquences modernes de l'application d'une sélection artificielle basée sur l'intelligence lors de la période de l'esclavage. Ce sujet très controversé porte sur l'étude de (en) liens entre l'origine ethnique et l'intelligence.

[edit] Leg - a question

I've noticed, and never knew before, that he is missing part of one of his legs. I knew though he was often walking with its crutches without noticing the missing portion of the leg. Does anyone know about what happen to him? A form of cancer or something, was he involved in a accident which amputed part of its leg? Thanks!--Booyah! 22:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

A car hit him while he was rescuing someone in danger

[edit] Disgusting grammar

The grammar and spelling in this sentence is disgusting: In 1975, after serving in the Canadian Forces as a psychiatrist, he started to work with offenders who've committed assaults and worked on many projects as an expert psychiatrist. participated at numerous travail as an expert on the psychatric domain.

Now, I'm not sure how I should go about fixing this mess. He started to work with offenders where, and they violated which law? What kind of assault, sexual? "Worked on many projects" is too vague, everybody works on projects an any given time. Same for the "travail"s (works) on the "psychatric" (psychiatric) domain. Maybe we should strip everything except that he served in the Canadian Forces? 66.130.179.31 22:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


Agreed, the grammar/spelling is horrible —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okandjo (talk • contribs) 22:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)