Talk:Pieces of a Dream (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Songs because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProjectSongs}} template, removing the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Video

why were my edits changed, the video was more clearly explained in my one

I didn't change it, but it needs to be changed drastically. The video should be summed up in only a few sentences, not described in great detail like it currently is - this is what fansites are for. At the moment, it looks embarrasing. If you want to help Anastacia, you should try and make this page look professional, and more like an encyclopedia entry Guylikeu 18:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Here we go again ,wiki is meant to be a place where other people add knowledge, and like always, if someone doesnt agree it has to be wrong.Why am i being picked on, lots of other videos are described in detail, this is an encyclopedia, who ever said they should be short, your the only one ever to complain

Firstly, I've never ever complianed about this before, so you're wrong about that last part. Second, you need to sign your entries with four tides (~).

As for the matter in hand, my complaint is not anything to do with the fact that you've described the video. I think it's recommended to describe the plot of the video within this article. The problem is that you've written about the video in sucvh great detail, it's uneccessaery. No-one needs to know who you think the man in the video is, you are not supposed to put your own opinions in there. Yes, Wikipedia is supposed to be a place where people add knowledge, but it needs to be relevant and neautral.

According to Wiki's own policy: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of items of information. That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia.[1]

Also: Plot summaries. Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.

All I'm suggesting is that you make the description much shorter, just give the reader a general idea of what the video is about.Try and place it in a real world context, about the making of the video, and it's recpetion if you can. Look at this article for what I'm talking about - [[2]]

Guylikeu 18:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome To My Truth, Heavy On My Heart and some others are described this way too, so I thought it was ok, I'm just learning from other people's mistakes. Sorry, you can changeit, im not sure what to get rid of, and i do think your 1st post was a bit harsh

Aw, I'm sorry you think that I was harsh. I'm a big Ana fan, and I want all her pages to look as good as other artist pages do. I'm glad we can comprimise & hopefully make the article as good as it can possibly be. I'll ahve to take a look at the other song pages you mentioned Guylikeu 00:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)