Wikipedia:Picture peer review/First web server

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] First web server

Do you think that one of these might be featured? They obviously have great historical importance and high resolution but may not have high enough quality.

Comments:

  • I'm afraid they don't come close to the standards expected of FP, even given the historical value. Although they're both sharp, the second one has particularly poor composition, lighting, scan quality & pretty much everything else (shot behind glass?) while the first is miles better from a composition POV but the very noisy, artifacted scan again precludes it from FPC. Very interesting but fatally flawed, unfortunately.--mikaultalk 13:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Seconder: