User:Pia L/sandbox3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Adopt an article
- Add relevant and necessary facts.
- Add relevant and necessary references.
- Balance NPOV by removing spectacular but on the whole irrelevant material.
- Images. All articles should have relevant illustrations if possible. Look through the interwikis, or browse through Commons.
- Copyedit. To be honest, many articles written by Swedes need a fair deal of copyediting:
- Make sure the Lead section is up to standards.
- Integrate "trivia"-sections into the text
- Clean up Swenglish
- Search and assess articles
This list is generated automatically every night around 10 PM EST.
| Firefly articles |
Importance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | High | Mid | Low | None | Total | ||
| Quality | |||||||
 FA |
1 | 1 | |||||
 GA |
1 | 1 | |||||
| B | 1 | 20 | 1 | 22 | |||
| Start | 1 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 28 | ||
| Stub | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 11 | ||
| Assessed | 4 | 38 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 63 | |
| Unassessed | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Total | 4 | 38 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 66 | |
[edit] Test menu short cut Sweden project
The Sweden Wikiproject is a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Sweden.
[edit] Scope
There are, in all, probably around 10,000 articles on English Wikipedia related to Sweden. The initial plan is to improve a selected number of well-known core articles. Core articles are things that most people recognize as related to Sweden.
[edit] Goals
Bringing all core articles first to Good status. When this has been done, bringing them to Feature status.
[edit] Article reviews
When an article has been sufficiently improved, read about What Good Articles are, and the quality standard of them. When you think the article meats the criteras, add {{GAnominee|24 September 2006}} to the nominated article's talk page. Then list the article here, for us to review.
- Nominated articles
- Carolus Linnaeus (Carl von Linné) went through a review and several things needed correction. A prt of the article is of good quality. / Fred-Chess 08:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Peer reviews
This is not a peer review in the academic sense, but is instead a review by project members; such peer reviews are invaluable in obtaining constructive commentary on an article, and are particularly helpful for articles which are headed towards featured article candidacies. Project peer reviews are more helpful than Wikipedia-wide ones, both because there is a greater chance of encountering a reviewer with some knowledge of the topic, and because it is much easier for project members to notice new requests without the need to filter out the vast majority of ones not related to their area of interest.
- For hints, see
- Nominated articles
- add your article
[edit] Core articles
- Template:Good: The article is listed as a Good article
: The article is listed as a Featured article.
