User talk:Phyzome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yo, talk about it.

Contents

[edit] Archives

Not really archives, just links to previous versions

[edit] Sandbox

Nice job cleaning that out. It's gone a long way from when I first found it, where it talked *only* about the computer concept (as in wikipedia) and didn't even mention a *real* sandbox! Thanks. Elf | Talk 20:23, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Ossification

I was wondering if you were planning to expand this stub a bit more. At present, it's really only a definition. --jag123 01:01, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I created because the pages intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification were too hard to find, and there wasn't an article on the general subject. I don't know enough about ossification to write the whole article, but I did put in some material that points to possiblities for expansion. For example, the two articles I mention above don't cover the subject of ossification of muscles and connective tissue. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 20:27, 2005 Jan 26 (UTC)

[edit] Return of the Untagged Image project

You were kind enough to contribute to the Wikipedia:Untagged images project; I beg to draw your attention to part 2 of the project - there are about 12,000 more images in need of tagging. Any assistance you could provide would be most welcome. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk)

[edit] Accident at WP:FAC (from User talk:Xiong)

FYI, Page duplications are usually due to a bug when section-editing, edit-conflicts & probably few other things interact in a wierd way. There is a bug filed at MediaZilla:275 about this (though the bug summary doesn't seem to state all the cases where the bug is triggered, you could submit info. about when the bug occurs). -- Paddu 21:01, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DC trip

Please list all your available dates in the table at Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip#Date. Thanks. --brian0918™ 18:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)


[edit] DC Meetup will be May 7/8

The DC Meetup date has been finalized to May 7/8. Even if you can only come one of the days, that's still fine. Please watch this page for new details, which will be posted in the next couple days: Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip --brian0918™ 16:11, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Don't stress too much about the underage thing. If we really neede to, we can leave and go elsewhere. However, I strongly suspect that Brickskeller will become very accomodating if they realize that a party of 10-15 people is going to leave because one or two are underage. Isomorphic 04:10, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DC

I am so sorry I couldn't make Brickskeller! I had a minor pet crisis that I had to deal with and it kept me busy all night. Did y'all have fun? · Katefan0(scribble) 15:06, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Response on Katefan0's talk page

[edit]  ::poke::

Haha, I found you. --Jacqui M Schedler 03:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your IRC message

Yeah, it did. Please see [1]. Bishonen | talk 10:14, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] You may be interested in the AfD about

Neanderthal theory of autism Jacqui ★ 21:48, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Up-down cues

Up-down cues has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 23:13, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for poking me. I've removed the notice, and I'm working on expanding the article now. I feel it is an important subject within interaction design, especially as long-term manned space missions are being considered. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 01:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Cool. I didn't prod it, I just wanted to make sure you knew about it. NickelShoe 02:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Plants

Hi! As a member of the WikiProject Plants you might be interested in supporting the nomination of Cactus for Article Improvement Drive. I honestly think that there is an underrepresentation of plants among featured articles. This is our chance! If you agree, you can support the nomination at theAID page. --Chino 07:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your response to my year-old question :0

Just found my forgotten user talk page googling my name and found your answer to my question about vandalism. Thanks! Alex Hall 08:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unitarian Universalist Service Committee

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Falcon (Talk) 00:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Red drop comment

See my comment for you on the Talk:Red edge page. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 18:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image

Oops, I guess I accidentally mistaked that for vandalism. Thanks for telling me, I reverted myself.   jj137 ♠ 21:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Anatomy

I was curious if article such as Pectus excavatum fall under the scope of WikiProject Anatomy. Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 18:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I haven't been very active on WP for a few years, so I hardly even remember that WikiProject. If you think it falls in that scope, then a far as I'm concerned, it does. :-) -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 19:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oh, Okay

Whatever you say. Ask D.N.A.- Peter Napkin (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Licensing dispute on four-leaf clover

Hi Tim, I took that picture of the 4 leaf clover. I don't mind other people using it, but I do ask that you attach my name, "photo by Aileen Kiernan" or the like. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bambeana (talk • contribs) 19:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Ha, I sincerely doubt that. Perhaps it looks like a picture you took? I'm sure there are a lot of photos of four-leaf clovers. Unfortunately, the EXIF data won't prove anything, since back in 2005 I was cropping all my photos in Adobe Photoshop without the "preserve EXIF data" checkbox turned on. I've reverted your edits to the Image: page as well as to four-leaf clover. The first revert is for putting your name as a byline under the photo (that's not how it's done here), the second is due to the need for a licensing template. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 20:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Just had a thought. What camera do you claim you used to take that photo? I know what I used, and I think there are ways of analyzing a photo to determine the camera of origin. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 20:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
You deleted your comment after I responded. Again, that's not how things work around here. I'm putting your comment back, for the record. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 20:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, if the picture was from 2005 then maybe I was wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bambeana (talk • contribs) 20:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)