User talk:Phydaux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] PC Gamer citations
I've created the text that you'll need to add a citation, just copy the contents of each box and paste it at the end of the appropriate text. The References section is already there so the rest will be automatic.
There are some citation templates here that are cut and paste. - X201 23:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
<ref>{{Harvard reference | Surname= | Given= | Authorlink= | Title="Article originally shipped with a floppy disk" | Journal=PC Gamer | Volume=1 | Issue=11 | Year=1994 | Page=5 | URL= }}</ref>
<ref>{{Harvard reference | Surname= | Given= | Authorlink= | Title="First CD Gamer included content from previous floppies" | Journal=PC Gamer | Volume=1 | Issue=11 | Year=1994 | Page=15 | URL= }}</ref>
[edit] Goths and emos
In the message you left on my improve me page, you claimed I attacked goths and emos, I did not, I merely analysed the situation, it wasn't flattering to htem, but then, if thats the way it is, thats the way it is. I didnt say one derogatory or bad word against them (bar unoriginal, but if you take offence from that you are somewhat touchy) so really, I think you should reviwe your comments. Philc TECI 18:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Calling groups of people incapable of original thought and unoriginal counts as an attack in my books, especially when they see that as one of their defining characteristics. It seemed that you waited for the smallest of opportunity to voice your views on two groups of people. You say you analysed a situation, but there was no situation being discussed until you added your comment. It is never the words that offend but the tone and situation they are used in. I believe you are smart enough to know what you were saying and how it would have been interpreted by others, that is why I added my comments to your improvement page. If you genuinely didn't mean to offend you should take this as an opportunity to think more about how your words could be interpreted by others. I'm sure there are many forums on the net where you can discuss your views on goths and emos with others, the wikipedia reference desk isn't the place, especially if they are just looking for a name for a band. --Phydaux 20:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Database conversions
You recently replied to a question of mine at the Reference desk for computing:
I have tried to find an SQL querying program on my computer to use for my task, but was unable to find something to do so. I noticed that you have Windows XP (which is what I have) and might be able to tell me how to do this, if possible. Thanks for your help! --WillMak050389 23:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I had a look at MS Works Database functionality and it doesn't look like it has SQL querys (I assumed it would).
- If you are able to copy the data to a spreadsheet program you could use the formula
="[[" & A2 & "]] by [[" & B2 & "]]"
in column C. This is assuming that A2 & B2 are the first row of data in the spreadsheet and you would copy the formula down to the last row. Then the formula result's would be the data you were after.
- If you have more than 65536 rows of information (The most Excel/Calc can hold) it would be better to use a database program, like Base or Access, which is a bit more long-winded.
- Let me know how you get on. --Phydaux 22:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I figured it out, but it was kind of annoying to enter it in for each item, but the page should be up soon: http://www.lyricwiki.org/User:WillMak050389/My_Songs (Still not finished though). Thanks for your help! --WillMak050389 03:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Friends Provident entry
Ollywilton 11:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Hi Phydaux, I have been reviewing the Friends Provident entry on Wiki - and it has been marked as reading like an advert by yourself. I completely appreciate the need for a complete lack of soap box and for a neutral point of view on Wiki - however upon reading the entry I fail to find any thing that is non-balanced, non-factual or promotional. And upon seeing your IP is linked with a competitor I thought I would get in touch.
Can you highlight the reasons you flagged this entry as such? I would ask you to rescind the flag or specifically alert me to which sections you see as unsuitable.
Cheers
ollywilton
- Response on your user page. --Phydaux 10:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Friends Financial
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Friends Financial, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gr1st (talk) 19:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Friends financial logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Friends financial logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)