Talk:Phowa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Buddhism This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Phowa, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

I changed some of the page. It was previously not neutral at all so the warning was correct. Please fill in more details and correct the incorrect. Thanks

[edit] NPOV

On the main page of this subject it says that there is a discussion on the pruposed description of the subject. It says: "This article may not conform to the neutral point of view policy. A Wikipedian has nominated this article to be checked for its neutrality. Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page.", but I cannot find a link to the discussion or talk page. Could this be corrected, so that we can join in to the discussion about neutrality.

Congratulations! You created the talk page. No one explained why the article was questioned, although I do question some of the content. Csbodine 04:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
As no reason has been cited, I have removed the 'POV check' tag for now. Dforest 03:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incorrect information

There seems to be a lot of unneccesary and incorrect sources quoted here. Also, the page lacks a lot of information and hopefully, someone with more knowledge than me can improve it. However, I feel that it might be difficult, seeing as how the Six Yogas of Naropa are supposed to be kept secret. Jmlee369 (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I concur that much of the information here is somewhere between questionable and obviously wrong. It needs a total overhaul. Fortunately, I believe that there are reliable public sources that describe the practice in some depth. I thought that Lama Yeshe had one, but I can't locate it. Still, it should be possible to do a proper job. Arthur chos (talk) 11:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)