Talk:Photorealistic (Morph)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This appears to be just an application of Morphing. The title and description seem somewhat spurious as well. It is not clear how photoshop would be used, or why the title is Photorealistic. I think it might be best to eliminate this entry Farley13 20:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

I think this article should be deleted.exe 02:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete it if you want to, but it is a regurarly used artistic technique in computer graphics. If you ask me you guys just don't like the example image and want a clear tutorial on how you can adjust computer graphic renderings in photoshop to be more life-like. Maybe we could do that if you really have a problem with this entry. I have refrences from people who work in computer graphics who have taught me how to do this. If it is that bad I don't see why there are so many people on this entrys history who have helped and contributed to the article. Waldo3277 16:00, 19 June 2006 (EST)

Another thing that I think is important to mention, is that I shared this article on my draft page with everyone on the wikipedia channels on freenode and they whole heartedly supported this wikipedia entry. Waldo3277 16:17, 19 June 2006 (EST)

Oh my God this article sucks big time! (unsigned)

I think this article should be deleted. It's pointless and has nothing to do with photo realism. The image doesn't help clear up anything either, is the process shown left to right or right to left? After reading through the article a few times, trying to decode what was actually ment by it, I think the process is shown right to left, I suggest it should be edited to show left to right, and also have a description added to avoid confusion. Infact, I think this whole article should be removed to avoid confusion, the title is confusing and nothing is actually explained within the article itself.dartmerc 14:29, 06 July 2007 (EST)

This is not the little article that could. Another vote for deletion.