Talk:Phosphorus tribromide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Phosphorus tribromide is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. | ||
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry. | ||
| Core | This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist. | ||
| A | This article has been rated as A-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
Phosphorus tribromide was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Delisted version: August 4, 2007 |
I'm wondering if there is enough material to write a separate Phosphorus pentabromide article, or if it can be lumped in with this one and called Phosphorus bromides. I suppose there will be no separate article on Phosphorus oxybromide - that it will be lumped in together with this one or a new Phosphorus pentabromide article. H Padleckas 15:06, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I'd like to keep this page specific to PBr3, but I agree that PBr5 and POBr3 aren't important enough to warrant pages of their own. Maybe we should have a separate page called Phosphorus bromides? It could summarise info on this page too. OR should we have a more general page altogether on phosphorus halides and another on phosphorus oxyhalides?
- By the way, I have finished for the time being, though I was rather rushing to get it finished so there are some more things I might add in the future if I had time. I'd be interested to know what complexes there are containing metals with PBr3 as a ligand, and also how PBr3 may be reacted with things like Grignards to make R-PBr2 or similar, are such things done/useful? Exactly how is PBr3 used commercially, i.e. the specific reactions? I've seen it used in my old company, but I'm not breaking any secrecy agreements there! Walkerma 17:51, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I don't know of any specific use for PBr3 except as a brominating agent and (rarely) as a non-aqueous solvant. Metal complexes almost certainly exist: I would look to trans-[MCl(CO)(PBr3)2] (M = Rh, Ir) for examples, then do a WoS search to find others. They will have been prepared during the research on QSAR in phosphine complexes: however, I'm sure that they're not simple to isolate, and there is a risk of thermodynamic instability towards oxidative addition of the P–Br bond. Until I'm proven wrong, I would say that they are of academic interest only. As for the reaction with Grignards, it is pratically impossible to stop the reaction before the PR3 stage, even when working with PCl3. To obtain RPX2 or R2PX, you have to use other (longer) routes, at least to my knowledge, e.g.:
PPh3 + Cl2 → PPh3Cl2 → PhPCl2 + C6H5Cl PhPCl2 + PPh3 → 2Ph2PCl
Alkylchlorophosphines are even more complicated... Physchim62 14:13, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Compare pics
Yes! The PNG file definitely looks sharper! You even straightened out my lone pair! (I hadn't noticed till then) Did you use Photoshop, or IrfanView? I didn't use PNG only because the file size was much bigger, and I notice that the new file is twice the size- if the sizes are the same is the quality the same? When I scan my structures in, if I save it as PNG the file comes out 4x the size. If I shrink it to the same size, then the quality (as far as I can tell) gets worse than the JPG of the same size. I will have to look into getting something that will convert over without scanning, I think. Cheers, Walkerma 21:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I used neither Photoshop nor IrfanView. I have neither one. I just used the Microsoft Windows XP version of Paint which has actually become a fairly decent program compared to earlier versions of Paint in previous Microsoft Windows software. For this PBr3, I took your Image:Phosphorus tribromide.jpg file, copied it into a *.bmp file (from the big picture directly from the image page, not the smaller one in the Phosphorus tribromide article) using my AOL 9.0 software. Then I "cleaned up" your pic using the "Paint" software and saved it into a *.PNG file. The full sized pic is in Image:Phosphorus tribromide.PNG and the pics aboved are thumbs of these reduced to 150 px on this Talk page. I now show the file sizes in the captions. The *.PNG file is 75% bigger than the *.jpg file. I am still trying to further clean up the picture so I can further sharpen it a bit and reduce the file size. In the meantime, I will soon insert my new Image:Phosphorus pentachloride.PNG pic into Phosphorus chlorides. H Padleckas 13:06, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Another new cleaned-up version of the PBr3 pic was downloaded. The full size version of the pic is a little sharper, but comparisons of the 150 px size pics don't show it. The electrons were rounded and one of the P-Br bonds was moved slightly. The file size was reduced by more than 5000 bytes (5 kB) from the previous *.PNG image file. H Padleckas 17:52, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Thanks again, the new pictures look great. I have been on the phone about getting better drawing software, either ChemDraw or IsisDraw, so I can make PNG files directly. I probably need an upgrade anyway- till then I'll have to muddle through. BTW, PCl3 has a 100° bond angle, PF3 is 96.3, PI3 is 102. Walkerma 19:20, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Regarding phosphorus pentabromide, I found that someone had typed some nonsense in and started an article, so I wrote a basic table + stub. Walkerma 17:24, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
The article PBR3 has been merged into this one. It's edit history at the date of merging is as follows:
- 02:50, 27 Apr 2005 User:SteveW m (wikified, stubbed)
- 06:54, 22 Jan 2005 User:172.196.172.76 (added extra info)
- 04:10, 19 Jan 2005 User:68.52.37.189 (Creating Page)
For copyright reasons, please do not delete this information. Physchim62 21:14, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] GA Delisted
This article has been removed from the GA list due to excessive amounts of jargon as well as a lack of citations. this article can also benefit from the addition of a section about the history of the chemical. If you feel that this review was in error feel free to take it to WP:GA/R. Tarret 20:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
