Talk:Phone Losers of America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 18/3/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 15/2/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
[edit] No more abuse
Don't post things like this:
Anirak says TALK!
- Like, no! --Rolf L. Mayo
- Some jackass removed my secret message
There's a forum for that, provided you never post or talk.
Most of the information on this page is pointless. If you want a page, I'd suggest just sticking to a broader history or the "group". Listing the issues of your useless zines is pointless. It's nothing that anyone would really want to know, because nothing groundbreaking was ever covered in any of them. Try just stating that you started off writting a zine and keep it to that. --intelshoe
This isn't even ArtiCAL worthy. Tokechu was obviously smoking crack (The drug of the FUTURE!) when wrote this. Why not put up something a bit more polished and professional, eh? (This unsigned comment was added by 24.208.124.76).
Please sign your comments. --Tokachu 00:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
I think the CNBC interview should be put back in place. --Murd0c516 03:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Is there a link on CNBC's web site? Or any information that could prove that it even happened? --Tokachu 16:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AFD debate link
This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion
Delete it.
This group is lame and should not warrant any public notice outside they have a website and some computer skills.
A bunch of late 20 something / early 30 EMO adults dreaming of movies like "Wargames" and "Hackers".
All childish insults and nothing to show for it. Should be in the 2600 "Hall of Wussies".
