User talk:Philosopher1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] WP:3RR
Please be aware that you're only allowed to revert three times per day per article and you appear to be bumping up against that limit, if you haven't already broken it, on the Christianity article. A.J.A. 18:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Here's the way I see it
You're about to go over 3RR, you haven't even responded to the section on the Christianity talk page now dealing with your additions, you seem to be advocating through one of your latest edit summaries a philosophy that if there are citations anywhere in anything that you write that it is automatically neutral, you just blanked your user page after a sockpuppet tag warning, and as far as I can tell, maliciously tagged the person who tagged you as the same sock. I think you're heading for bad times if this is how you plan to edit Wikipedia as long as you're editing on it. Homestarmy 18:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Yes its all a group of F.U.B.A.R American Christian administrators.
I wonder why there are no admins from other countries - there is no rhetoric - its a fact .Bloody circumcised assholes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philosopher1 (talk • contribs)
- Hi there. I'm the admin who blocked you. I'm an atheist from Ireland. Pleased to meet you :) - Alison☺ 13:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Extended block to 48 hours. Looks like you could use more cooldown time.--Isotope23 16:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I just reverted your personal attack upon myself and another administrator. Do it again and your block will be extended - Alison☺ 04:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Alison (talk · contribs) issued your original block for WP:3RR and I extended it per this... and now I'm extending it to 1 week. You are completely free to have your opinion, but when you start saying things like this in reference to your fellow editors, that is a problem and it is strictly against our policy against personal attacks. Please take this time to review Wikipedia:Five pillars, particularly the section on the code of conduct.--Isotope23 13:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)