User talk:Phillind
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Speedy deletion of Jean Griswold
A tag has been placed on Jean Griswold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Your recent edit to Jean Griswold (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jean Griswold. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- pb30<talk> 17:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Phillip Silverstone
A tag has been placed on Phillip Silverstone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 17:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Phillip Silverstone, you will be blocked from editing. Creating the article in two different capitalisations doesn't mean that it will escape deletion. It simply means that your disruptive editing is coming to the attention of more people Mayalld (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Phillip silverstone. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mayalld (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Phillip silverstone, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please READ the message! hangon is placed there AS WELL AS the speedy deletion notice, not instead of Mayalld (talk) 17:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC) I've added it to AFD instead of speedy deleting. · AndonicO Hail! 17:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Phillip Silverstone
An editor has nominated Phillip Silverstone, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Silverstone and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppetry case
 |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Phillind for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mayalld (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Linking to other articles in wikipedia
Please don't link to other wikipedia articles by quoting the full URL. You should enclose the relevant article name in double square brackets, thus;
[[name of article]]
Mayalld (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Jean Griswold, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please ensure that you use proper internal links Mayalld (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Commercial Advertising
There would be no limit to the number of commercial websites which could be advertised on Wikipedia, so please don't add commercial sites as you did to Home Care. There was another site link there which I have also deleted. Thank you. dbfirs 20:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Jean Griswold 2006 jpeg.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Jean Griswold 2006 jpeg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sandwich generation month
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Sandwich generation month, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
