User talk:Philc 0780

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unfortunately, Philc 0780 has retired as a Wikipedia editor. Best wishes and good luck!

Contents

[edit] Are all these templates really neccesary

There are so many templates on wikipedia nowadays. It seems so many are irrelevant, template cruft, though this has become something of a feature of wikipedia since i joined. Nobody actually wants to contribute useful information to the project, just show off their wiki-coding schools by adding useless crap, that can just about justify itself to the point of not being immediately deleted. This isnt myspace, if you want to show off coding skills go there! these templates are useless. Almost all templates found at the bottom of pages are far better off being categories, as they have no benefit as being a template, and simply clutter the articles. Thank you. Philc 21:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Current

[edit] James Milner Career section

Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Epicurus

Phil, if you are still around, and if you are still interested, the quotation from Epicurus is to be found in O'Connor at pages 64-5. The wording varies slightly, though not much, from that which I remembered, so I must have picked it up from a different translation. My apologies for taking so long over this. Clio the Muse 00:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:FA Premier League winners

A tag has been placed on Template:FA Premier League winners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted image

Hi, Phil. The image you asked about was deleted with the summary "was an image with fair use tag but no fair use rationale for more than seven days." Image licenses are REALLY not an area I dabble in much. You would get a much better answer from ^demon, the editor who actually deleted it. Joyous! | Talk 02:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)