Template talk:Philippine territorial disputes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Miangas
The template does not specify whether it is about past or current disputes so i've readded [[ Palmas island. -23prootie 08:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- It does leave the impression, that the territory's status has to be resolved. If it has been resolved, it simply is not anymore disputed. — scorpion prinz 13:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- But if past disputes are all resolved then this template would cease to exist.-23prootie 21:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly. If all disputes are resolved, this template would be irrelevant. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 07:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- But why keep this template in the first place if it is to be deleted anyway? Why can't historical disputes be included for historical purposes? and when all disputes are resolved, why can't we rename this template to historical territorial disputes of the Philippines? 23prootie 18:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- But if past disputes are all resolved then this template would cease to exist.-23prootie 21:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Lets put it this way, once it is resolved, it's not "disputed" anymore so it is senseless to add entries which aren't disputed. --Howard the Duck 06:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- But your acting as if this never existed so that the problem. Anyway I'm putting it inn this template so it does not get lost in the multitude of wiki articles.23prootie (talk) 09:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Lets put it this way, does Template:NBA include the defunct franchises? No. Neither should this. When the NBA dissolves, now that's the time to add all of the defunct franchises, or even delete the template. --Howard the Duck 16:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)