From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
Describing Anomean theology as heresy is POV (and insulting). Jacob Haller 05:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- It certainly wasn't intended as such--heresy is an accepted historical term for something considered a heresy at the time. I have clarified. Chick Bowen 21:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Anomeanism was considered a heresy by its opponents. Homoousionism was considered a heresy by its opponents. Both, of course, at the time. But, yes, it looks better. I ought to expand the article sometime soon. Jacob Haller 23:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
