Talk:Philosopher king

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)

Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.

Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

This article could use a picture. Even if it may be transwikied to wikitionary, a picture would really be inspirational. It does not hinder but rather enhances the objectivity of the article. Enerjen 3 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Other Candidates

Here are some other famous rulers/statesmen that could possibly be seen as a philosopher king:

[edit] Enlightened Absolutists

[edit] Jefferson?

Under what context would Thomas Jefferson be considered a "philosopher king"? True, he was a great idealistic founding father, but why wouldn't Madison, Hamilton, or Washington be considered one? Especially when compared to Benjamin Franklin whom, at least in my opinion, was one of the most philosophical out of all of them.

Whom?
Careless misuse of grammar 24630 02:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Dick Cheney? You've got to be joking. Is there some sort of obsession to put an American politician on the list or something of that sort? --124.170.82.115 10:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
More to the point, none of them are kings. They didn't rule anything; they may have led, legislated, or governed, but they're not kings (or queens).
Sorry, that was FZ (talk) 15:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removed Joke

I removed:

The citation request was not properly inserted. Also, what was said on the show, just as the text added here. Is a joke which distracts from the scholarly nature of this page, and bears no academic relevance to the concept of the "philosopher king". It's pop culture, not philosophy.

Edit: Also important is that the concept of "historical", under which the removed portion was listed by nature suggests someone who is not currently in a position to be described as a philosopher king.