User talk:PHDrillSergeant/archive01
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] SGCSim
Hey Sam you edited the SGCSim article a few days ago, removing the "on hold" bit for version 5.1.0. Do you have any evidence to back that up? Also, your name is familiar, are you on SGCSim.com or FanFiction.net or GameFAQs.com ? tpg1989 06:29, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:PHKyoukan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PHKyoukan.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 12:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- I have fixed the copyright problem. -PH
[edit] Thanks
... for the message. I totally understand the frustration, and in the short-term probably not a bad idea. But some people do it -- and leave it there for an extended period of time -- without realizing that it in fact does nothing to protect the article. Then it just gets confusing to editors. Nothing to worry about, thanks for your hard work. · Katefan0(scribble)/poll 20:42, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA
If you wish to file a new RfA start a new page, don't write over the old one. --Cyde Weys 01:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- My bad, sorry. -PH
[edit] Apology
- I wish to extend to you an apology for a fiery temper and the personal attacks. I would like to hear an apology from you too. Why? I think you did some personal attacking of your own today. --Bookofsecrets 00:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Wado(Thank you in Cherokee), for the apology on my talkpage. It is much appreciated and has gained my respect. --Bookofsecrets 00:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I approve!
I love cheese. My favorite is probably double gloucester. Or maybe cheddar with chives. Or cheddar with mustard seeds. Oh why bother picking a favorite? I'll eat all of it. · Katefan0 (scribble)/poll 15:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reefer Madness (1936 film) gallery
I see you removed the image gallery on Reefer Madness (1936 film), saying "The gallery is not appearing properly. I have removed it until this problem is fixed." What browser/OS/screen resolution combination are you using? It appears perfectly fine on Firefox, Windows XP, all resolutions. So I'm going to revert your removal, on the theory that it appears correctly for the majority of Wikipedia users. If you disagree, please add to the Talk page. --Quuxplusone 05:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dr. McNinja
Because its article was deleted through WP:AFD rather than WP:PROD, I moved your deletion request from the "Proposed deletions" sections into the main "Decisions to be reviewed" area. You can access the discussion directly at Wikipedia:Deletion review/The Adventures of Dr. McNinja. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 13:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Aspergian Wikipedians
Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
[edit] Cyde
I'm deeply sorry if I offended you with my comment. But you were indeed wikilawyering, and proclaiming a good-faith contributior was acting in bad faith. I really do not think you are in a posistion to lecture fellow contributors about unnecessary commments in light of your most recent addition to Cyde's talkpage [1].
I'll not argue that Cyde's methods are not always favorable amoung the community, but I'm sure he's acting in good faith, as are you. We all have different viewpoints on what is best for the encyclopedia, and Cyde is merely invoking that. -ZeroTalk 16:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cyde Weys
- I've moved this section started by User_talk:PHDrillSergeant to his talk page, and am urging him to take this to the next step in dispute resolution. This page is not for resolving longstanding disputes between editors, but for dealing with relatively urgent incidents that may need the attention of an administrator.
Please see Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. --Tony Sidaway 00:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
(Moved from Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance -- Porphyric Hemophiliac § 22:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC))
Cyde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) (aka Cyde Weys) has been, for the past month, abusing his administrator privileges. I have seen him block users for small infractions, flame people who speak against him, unblock himself because it was inconvenient, delete templates which have reached a mostly unanimous keep consensus, troll, and be, in general, not a nice person.
Also, the user Fake User (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) is, most probably, a sock puppet of Cyde; on WP:TfD, in the May 15 section, Fake User made many userbox deletion requests (this was of course after Cyde was asked not to make any more userbox deletion requests) at 19:21 UTC, beginning Here. Ten minutes later, at 19:30, Cyde went through and added "Subst and delete, not an encyclopedic template" to EVERY one of Fake User's requests. This tells me that Fake User (added just a day or two after Cyde's promise to not make any more userbox deletion requests) is almost definitely a sock puppet of Cyde in order for him to keep deleting things without reprimand. Not to mention, everywhere I go, Cydebot is screwing up User pages.
Cyde is rude, patronizing, denigrating, and seems to believe that Wikipedia is "not a community"; it is simply an encyclopedia and nothing more. I belive that Cyde needs to be de-admined, asked to take a Wikibreak, or at least spoken sternly to. Because of Cyde, I, myself, have been as of late contemplating leaving my beloved Wikipedia. I am at my wits' end, and I do not wish to be "cyber-bullied" by this admin anymore. Nor does anyone else. --Porphyric Hemophiliac § 01:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Although not directly affected, I have definately seen Cyde act certain ways that are very inappropriate for an admin Paul Cyr 01:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Same here. He has nomed so many userboxes that it isn't even funny Aeon 17:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I second that motion; I do agree with PHDrillSergeant. If an admin abuses his/her powers, they will need to be desysoped, or at least put on administrative probation. Funnybunny (talk/Counter Vandalism Unit) 23:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- We shouldn't be too quick to jump on the desysop wagon, but I do believe that the sheer volume of complaints against Cyde recently suggests a more formal investigation into claims against them be raised. I will say that some of the complaints have been incredibly baseless, but this should be looked into. The Ungovernable Force 23:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I second that motion; I do agree with PHDrillSergeant. If an admin abuses his/her powers, they will need to be desysoped, or at least put on administrative probation. Funnybunny (talk/Counter Vandalism Unit) 23:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Same here. He has nomed so many userboxes that it isn't even funny Aeon 17:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
PHDrillSergeant, please see some of the discussions above for further complaints about Cyde and his actions. --mboverload@ 23:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Question: Can anyone point to an instance where Cyde has performed an action that directly inhibited the editing of the encyclopaedia? --Sam Blanning(talk) 23:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Depends on how broad your definition is. I won't bring up my own experiences; While they were less than the taste of honey in my mouth I haven't a reason to go off trolling for/against Cyde. --Avillia (Avillia me!) 23:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- You'll need to be able to view deleted edits, but Template:User Christian certainly qualifies as an example of deliberately disruptive activity that wasted a lot of time that would have been otherwise spent on encyclopedia-editing, and drove some valued editors away from editing Wikipedia ever again. -Silence 00:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've been at ends with many of Cyde's actions, but still think that he may be doing what he thinks is best for the encyclopedia. This may not be what everyone else wants, but generally there is nothing that everyone wants. Nothing he's done seems to warrant any quick desysop this guy before the project burns to the ground reactions. This doesn't seem to be an actionable item here on AN/I, but may need more details as mboverload above mentioned. An RfC may be a good start. — xaosflux Talk 00:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Nothing to do with userboxes warrants any anything. The userbox war is a game. If you choose to play, you accept that your piece may be taken. You may have to wait longer than in Counter Strike before you're back in the game, but it's much less of a wait than in chess. Much like Russian Roulette, the only way to win is not to play. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Or to load the gun with blanks. On a different note, the guy has already had two different RfCs. --Avillia (Avillia me!) 00:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nothing to do with userboxes warrants any anything. The userbox war is a game. If you choose to play, you accept that your piece may be taken. You may have to wait longer than in Counter Strike before you're back in the game, but it's much less of a wait than in chess. Much like Russian Roulette, the only way to win is not to play. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Can you dig up links to those RfCs? I was thinking of filing an RfC after his recent rudeness at AN/I, but if it's just more of the same stuff that's been complained about in previous RfCs, there's not much point of filing again, is there? If anyone were serious about doing something, it'd be time for ArbComm. -lethe talk + 01:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- According to our article on Russian Roulette even blanks can cause concussion or deafness. Besides, only two? Even I have one of those. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
Userboxes? Yawn. Drop me a line when you want to complain about something that actually impacts the encyclopedia. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy Deletion
I have tagged one of your articles for speedy deletion. Please feel free to defend your article. --Siva1979Talk to me 21:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I have tried to find the history of my edits as well as your edits and I could not find the proper name of the article you have created just before 21:26, 21 May 2006! I guess, I should have linked the particular article in your User Talk page. My mistake! Anyway, the article in question was most probably deleted by one of the administrators after tagging it. I guess that even they found the article fit for speedy deletion as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 01:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to Esperanza!
Now that you are a member, you might be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.
In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.
I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee, Titoxd, JoanneB, and Freakofnurture.
If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page, or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users on our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, please see the IRC Tutorial, which was written by one of our members. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to be!
Thanks!—G.He 21:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UESPWiki
So.. You like Elder Scrolls, and you like Wikipedia. Ever thought about helping us out at UESPWiki (http://uesp.net)? We all could sure use your knowledge about Wikipedia, and about the Elder Scrolls series in general. :) --Aristeo 13:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Saladin1970 appeal/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 14:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 8-Bit Theater edit
Evening. Recently, you made an edit to the "Unanswered Questions" section of the 8-Bit Theater article. Specifically, you removed one of the questions. But, it appears that you did so based upon your own speculation about the answer to the question. Firstly, your speculation was incorrect, as the conversation in the comic obviously takes place in the future. Secondly, lots of people have their own speculations about that particular comic, but that doesn't mean that they should remove the question simply because they think they know the answer. If the question is officially answered, then it's alright to remove it, but please don't edit articles based on speculation. Thanks. - Kalarchis 04:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dr. McNinja (again)
Pory,
I'm defending your position on your second request for Dr. McNinja's undeletion. I encourage you to find others who can add support, because it seems in the past the article has suffered from inadequate defense. Likewise, please let me know if there is anything I can do further to help. I'll be keeping my eyes open, but [emailing me] will be the quickest way of getting in touch with me. McNinja is notable, and we just need to convince the others of it. No one will benefit if Wikipedia stays lax until it's glaringly obvious that it's deserving.
On a side note, I love your username; I'm a Morrowind junkie myself.
Keep the faith, BDD 19:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dr. McNinja DRV successful
Hi,
I have closed the DRV on Dr. McNinja, and your proposed recreation has been permitted. As such, I have moved your draft to the article space, and submitted the article for a new AfD, per standard procedure. Best wishes, Xoloz 17:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 12th.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 24 | 12 June 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 01:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Although no consensus was reached in the end, I still wanted to thank you for your vote in my recent RfA. Thank you very much. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 19th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 25 | 19 June 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Congratulations!
Although not mentioned by name, I believe you are the "Wikipedia police" mentioned in this report, for this revert on Human and then adding {{behave}} to User talk:216.99.99.127... Fame at last! -- ALoan (Talk) 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed -- PHDrilLSergeant is indeed the police mentioned in "IVOR TOSSELL"'s article.
- "I was vandalizing the Wikipedia the other day..." - and this is what passes for journalists these days?? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 26th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 26 | 26 June 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A-V Barnstar
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Seeing your mention, I thought "Wouldn't it be great to give him a barnstar? But he'd need to have done more than just revert I. Tossell." So I checked your contributions (consider yourself wiki-stalked): a plethora of vandalism reverts! You deserve it. :) Picaroon9288 20:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Signpost updated for July 3rd.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 26 | 26 June 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
[edit] Bushido Userbox
I followed a link to your user page, and saw your Modern Bushido userbox. Nice one. I might add that to my page. --Nobunaga24 06:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for July 10th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 28 | 10 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Signpost delivered by: RoyBoy 800 04:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I'm afraid you're a bit confused
In the article about Martha Jones you removed a bit of text because you said the Christmas Special had already aired, when in fact The Runaway Bride (Doctor Who) 2006 Christmas special is months away, I think you were thinking about the 2005 Christmas Special, The Christmas Invasion. As such, I'm switching the text back to how it was, thanks.--Khat Wordsmith 03:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the Barnstar!
Much appreciated. :) Vesperholly 08:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] LiveWire
The table on the Mountain Dew LiveWire page is not "superfluous." It is actually a great way to create a map of where LiveWire can be purchased. For those that do not have it in their area it is a valuable resource. Please don't take it down again, as it is useful information. --AutomaticFlo 18:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for July 17th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 29 | 17 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 05:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] LiveWire cont
The location paragraph says it is hard to find 20 ounces and cans, it does not mention where it can be found. So the table gives people a way to find out if LiveWire is available in their area. Those that happen upon the article can update the table with locations they know of. The idea is that there is a source to reference when looking for LiveWire. Let's say I am going on a trip and want to know if LiveWire will be available, I can just check its wiki to see if it is or not. So the table is not superfluous, it's novel and has a distinct purpose. --AutomaticFlo 15:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sourcing in Wallace Shawn
Hi. I just noticed that you added a {{fact}} flag in Wallace Shawn#Writing on a statement about A Thought in Three Parts. I tried to clarify this on the talk page: there is a printed source, which is already in the References section, but I'm not sure how best to indicate that it's the source for that one fact - especially since it's also the source for lots of other biographical information in the article. ←Hob 23:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Maryland
As a Wikipedian from Maryland, you have a unique perspective that I would like to hear about. I, too, grew up in Maryland, and saw very recently an extremely heated debate over which region Maryland fell into, the South or the Northeast. It is listed in the Northeastern article, but Maryland's page calls it a "border state," which is a cop-out if you ask me. Anyway, I was wondering where you think the state actually belongs. I personally believe that it is, in practice and politics, Northeastern. I would love to hear your opinion on this.
History21 08:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)History21
[edit] Signpost updated for July 24th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 30 | 24 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 04:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for July 31st
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 31 | 31 July 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 7th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your image
Hi, reduced the size of your image by 7 times. Also cleaned it to further reduce file size. Hope its ok :) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 07:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Some good software for JPG resizing is JPGCleaner it cleans the file of unneeded data (i.e: meta) also reducing the quality in PS can reduce the size without any apparent loss of quality, for PNGs OptiPNG is good. ;-) Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 20:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Hehe! Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 20:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Male. and only looking for females (lol) -- I guess your a scifi fan then ;)? Like BSG? Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 20:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh yes, shes hot.. so is Kristen Bell, Racheal Bilson (drool) _ I didnt really watch much of BSg 1978 (dont like the fact it looked weird) Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 20:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Got MSN Messenger?, easier to converse via IM :P! Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 20:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Added :)! Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 20:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Awww, thank you, thank you, thank you dear Sam! :) Your kind message moved me no end, and it is great to meet people as nice and kind as you :) By the way, what you said about me can also be said about you! When will this link turn blue? Needless to say, you're more than welcome to stop by any time and tell me how you're doing, and if you ever need my assistence for anything, either wiki-related or else, you know just where to find me, right? Take care, and ttyl! Hugs, Phaedriel ♥ The Wiki Soundtrack!♪ - 21:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AntiVandalBot
If AntiVandalBot is having any problems, you are to contact User:Cyde, who runs the bot. Thanks. --Woohookitty(meow) 04:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] August Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] Signpost updated for August 14th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 33 | 14 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 21st
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 34 | 21 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Medal of Honor
I noticed your edits to the MoH article. As an experienced editor, you know how important verifiability is to the editing process (WP:V). The matter you address, the proper name for the award, has been hashed out at length in the article's talk page. If you want to make a case for CMoH, you're going to need to line up your sources. One obstacle you'll need to overcome is the fact that images of actual citations used in some of the biographical articles clearly show the MoH and not the CMoH name. I'm going to guess at this point that some other editor has already gone directly to the source, the law establishing the medal, and pulled the name from that source. At any rate, replacing sourced information with unsourced information isn't going to fly on an article with such a high profile. Rklawton 22:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 28th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 35 | 28 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 5th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 36 | 5 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Porphyric hemophilia
Hello, you just deleted the article for polyphyric hemophilla and redirected it the page altogether.
The main problem is that the article wasn't about the actual disease, but about the disease in the Elder Scrolls universe- most specifically, it relates to the contraction of vampirism in those games. I believe that it is sufficently different to the real world illness to warrent it's own article, in addition to the fact it held a good chunk of the information about vamprism in those games and the fact I've been working on expanding it.
I'm off to to try and work out how to get it back, and probably how to get it on a page more similar to ' Polyphyric hemophilla (Elder Scrolls) or something of that nature. Morgrim 07:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry if I seemed a little snippy before, I still haven't worked out how to revert stuff and haven't really added to many articles yet. It looks good there, I'm off to fix any of the other Elder Scrolls articles that need pointing in the right direction. And uh...no, I didn't actually realise that was your commonly used user name, I just saw the PHDrillSergeant tag. *whistles as she walks off and makes a mental note not to edit or write stuff in the early hours of the morning...* Morgrim 19:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Porphyria
If you'd care to Google for "porphyric hemophilia" you will rapidly find that the term is made up for the purposes of the video game. There is no condition in clinical medicine that goes by that name; rather, it uses a misinterpretation of the concept "hemophilia" to suggest that porphyriacs "love blood" (they don't, honestly).
I am again removing the dablink from porphyria and have changed the redirect accordingly. Please provide evidence for the existence of "porphyric hemophilia" as a clinical entity before making these changes again. JFW | T@lk 23:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 200 (Stargate SG-1)
I eased up on some, but some of the things there do need a citation. I've explained my recent changes, point by point, on the discussion page. I'm also contacting the user who added the OR banned to the article so we can get his input. He may have different thoughts than yours. As far as where I'm coming from, I'm a Stargate fan who wants this article to pass muster. We get enough criticisms from some people as it is. --Bark 14:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm the person who originally added the OR tag. Hopefully you don't mind me joining in this conversation. In response to your message to User:Bark:
- Speculation ("This might be a reference to...") which does not need citation.
- No, but it's original research, and hence needs to be removed. See WP:NOR. An alternative to removing it is to change it to "It has been speculated that...", and providing a reference for the speculation.
- Knowledge gained from SG documentaries ("...Dan Shea, who is in fact also the Stunt Coordinator...") which does not need citation.
- Yes, it does - otherwise, how can a reader of the article verify that fact? It is possible to reference a SG documentary - see Template:Cite visual, among others, or alternatively the reference can be given without using a template.
- Knowledge about other series ("...which is what occured when fans of Firefly...") which does not need citation.
- This is a bit more tricky. The thing that occured with Firefly needs to be referenced.
- Info from actors themselves, usually from documentaries and behind-the-scenes ("...Amanda Tapping, who said...") which does not need citation.
- The documentaries and behind-the-scenes /are/ the references, and should be given.
- I hope that helps. If necessary, I will add citation needed tags to each instance where sources are needed, but there is likely to be an awful lot of them. Mike Peel 20:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 11th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 37 | 11 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| Carnildo resysopped | Report from the Hungarian Wikipedia |
| News and notes | Features and admins |
| Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AFD icons
I noticed you are using icons in the AFD discussions. Please read this rather non-NPOV titled discussion Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#stupid_bloody_icons for some reasons why people would prefer you not to. Cheers, Yomanganitalk 00:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, just wanted to make sure you were informed, which it turns out you already were. Doesn't bother me one way or the other. Cheers, Yomanganitalk 00:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re
My apologies. - aeiou123
[edit] Thank you.
I didn't realize that that would have been a problem. I saw those and I thought "Hey, I have an interesting idea!" I was tired and didn't think that they might have "taken over" the military page as you put it. I did intent to move them later to sort of a new "paramilitary" section of the professional templates page. -- Scetoaux 18:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA
I've added a few questions to your RfA. When you have a minute, I'd appreciate if you would take a look at them. Thanks. JoshuaZ 20:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 18th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 38 | 18 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] RfA thanks
Hey PHDrillSergeant, thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your RfA
I am sorry to inform you that your Request for Adminship (RfA) has failed to reach sufficient consensus for promotion, and has now been delisted and archived. Please do not look upon this outcome as a discouragement, but rather as an opportunity to improve. Try to address the concerns raised during your RfA and, in a few months' time, resubmit your request. Thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity! Redux 04:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks
 |
Hi, PHDrillSergeant, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Signpost updated for September 25th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 39 | 25 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inappropriate usernames
Hi. I was the one who raised an objection to the username 293.xx.xxx.xx. I'm not entirely clear how that isn't a "Name that look[s] like an IP address, including "invalid" IP addresses". If this one in particular is acceptable I think Wikipedia:Username needs to be clarified. Mark83 22:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 2nd.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 40 | 2 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| New speedy deletion criteria added | News and notes |
| Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 9th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 41 | 9 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] VP use on List of ship decommissionings in 1993
The revert you made to List of ship decommissionings in 1993 is obviously in error, as the edits were neither a sandbox experiment or vandalism, but were the addition of two entries into the list. If there is another reason you feel that Forrestal and Ranger do not belong on the list, please put it on the talk page for the list, thank you. Josh 20:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] why ?
hello sir , i dont know for what reason my edit on Jeddah should be reverted or removed , i dont think i have made any mistake sir. Ammar 20:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thanx man :D , have a nice day :) Ammar 20:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- would you mind to return my last edits ? because i dont know how :) Ammar 20:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- thanx again for cooperation sir :) by the way , how can i know the number of my editions ? Ammar 20:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- oops i thought u r an admin because u had deny my edit few minutes ago :D , anyways have a nice day Ammar 20:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Ram
Hi there; why is this controversial? There is a difference between a ram and a battering ram, and my usage of the word is correct and his is not. I really do not want to fall into a WP:3RR trap, but please look carefully before reverting my edit.--Anthony.bradbury 21:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Not wholly correct. On the dab page ram is listed half-way down as a warship of the 1860's. Very few Victorian warships attached a domestic sheep to their bow. Please review Wiki usage of links.--Anthony.bradbury 21:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edits to Online poker
Are you sure your test-n was supposed to be place on my talk page?? :-) Delta Tango | Talk 22:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edits to 1st Century
This was not a test. I wanted to keep the neutrality of the article, because it cannot be proved that a person named Jesus really was cruxified in the 1st century. I will put it back, until you can tell me how that was vandalism.
- I don't see the "sources" cited on the page... so I will go with "Supposed date of Jesus's Cruxifiction", what does one word meant to maintain the neutrality of the article hurt?
- It was one word that I put in to keep it neutral, because your facts are not always mine, now go back to worshipping the Holy Foreskin.
[edit] Curse of Ham
PHDrillSergeant, if you are going to contribute to a debate please be sure to identify what the debate is about. It is not about the actual race of Jesus. It is about this sentence currently in the article: "in Europe, some of the earlier representations of Christ, Mary etc. depict them as being dark-skinned." This is a false statement. None of the "earlier representations of Christ, Mary etc." depict them as dark skined. All of the earliest representations are of Jesus, and they depict him according to Greco-Roman artistic conventions (depictions of Mary come later). There are some medieval icons that appear very dark, but that's due to discolouration and pigment degredation. None of these are genuinely documented as early images. Also, if you are going to quote WP policy, be sure you do so where it is relevant. This debate is about the content of the article and about notability of sources. It has nothing to do with soapboxes or pushing "religious beliefs". By the way, it's false to say that the "generally accepted Eastern images" depict him as "middle eastern or black". The Eastern Orthodox churches have used very rigid conventions in icon imagery. The idea that artists attempted to represent "middle eastern" ethnicity is totally anachonistic. That's an issue from the 19th century on. There are very few images in whichJesus is depicted as black. Even the Ethiopian orthodox church does not typically do so. There are some Indian images from the St Thomas Christians that give him an Indian look. Paul B 08:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 16th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 42 | 16 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Val Henson
You said there that she "Meets WP:BIO by being the subject of several biographies". Could you point me to those biographies? JoshuaZ 00:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Real Canadian Superstore
Thanks for the welcome. I request a revert of my edit. It was intentional and intended to provide additional factual understanding to the article. Whitebox 05:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding this user
[edit] Gowda Hai Lowda (talk · contribs)
- Offensive login name (Lowda is Hindi street slang for testicles). New user. Engaged in making racial and ethnic slurs on 4 users after getting account:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haphar&diff=prev&oldid=82766133 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarvagnya&diff=prev&oldid=82766012 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hkelkar&diff=prev&oldid=82765885 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vikramji&diff=prev&oldid=82765692
Urgent action needed.Hkelkar 05:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ceviche
Why was my addition to the Ceviche page removed?
[edit] Signpost updated for October 23rd.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 43 | 23 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| Report from the Finnish Wikipedia | News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones |
| Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 30th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] Semen photo
Response to your post on my talk page: Saying that Wikipedia isn't censored isn't exactly accurate. It doesn't censor blindly for content, but if you were to edit the Semen page to say something like "semen is the manjuice that comes out of a guys dick when he's done fucking something (usually his own hand)", it would get reverted as vandalism. And if you did that a couple more times you'd be given a vacation from posting.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and there are plenty of editors and admins here who want to keep it encyclopedic. And that means changing content to suit the purpose. To me, and to other users that image is grafitti on the page it appears.
I don't object to images of porn on a page about porn. And I wouldn't object to semen2.jpg if it were used to illustrate the sort of content that one might find on the /b/ imageboard at 4chan.org, or at encycopediadramatica.com. I think in the article it's in isn't the best use of the image. The article is meant to address a clinical topic, and the image makes it seem vulgar and childish. I will seek an appropriate replacement image.
Honestly I feel like the KEEP side of the argument is being pushed by a bunch of unserious people who are mostly asserting their 'right to be disruptive'. Erielhonan talk | contribs 仕方が無い 19:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Reply to your reply: Please reread my arguments, and realize that I'm not talking about personal offence. You are moving the debate to me as an individual, and away from the appropriate of the image, which has repeatedly been called into question. Ad hominem, I think they call it, and it's not a legitimate debate tactic (even if it is effective).
- Just because I say the image is vulgar I don't place a personal, emotional judgement on it. It's an objective observation. Conventional wisdom, and a significant number of comments on the article's talk page, indicates that it's in bad taste, which makes it unsuitable where it sits. It seems to me that most of the arguments in favor of keeping the image don't address appropriateness or alternative images except in passing. The main argument is free speech which isn't a driving tenant in editorial policy. The image in its current use is unencyclopedic, and I will continue to push for its removal and/or replacement even if the IfD fails.
- Last observation: The "KEEP" camp seems to me to be a vocal minority taking on the appearance of a majority. Historically (on the article's talk page) when someone protests the image they are responded to with empty-sounding arguments about free speech, censorship, and unsupported claims of appropriateness. The style of argument employed by most supporters could be used to justify anything if it were logically valid. Fortunately for the rest of Wikipedia, it is not. Erielhonan talk | contribs 仕方が無い 20:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for November 6th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Intellipedia
Without sources, I'm going to have to leave it the way it is until I get word otherwise. If it's found out that it is a hoax, I'll issue a retraction, but I really can't mess with the story without sources that most of the entire mainstream media screwed up. Ral315 (talk) 01:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for November 13th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your signature
Your signature {{User:PHDrillSergeant/Signature}} should not use transclusion. See Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages#Transclusion/template.
P.S. Nothing personal in my comments regarding WP:COUCH.
Cheers, —Doug Bell talk•contrib 20:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry you're stressed
Hi. I'm sorry that today was not a good Wiki-day for you. I understand what you were trying to accomplish with the Couch, and I hope you can relax on the Good Side for awhile and then rejoin us. Regards, Newyorkbrad 00:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cheer up!
Hey! Though I haven't met you here we've chatted on the IRC channel... you gave me lots of hugs, I thought I'd return the favour :-) Have a cloud, and come on over if you want to rant or rage or cry or whatever you feel like doing :-) — Editor at Large(speak) 04:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Abuse of Admin powers
Sam:
Saw your comment on my talk page. While I appreciate your advice, I however have a more important question: there is a user who claims administrator status, who is obviously not of legal adult age, and is abusing his powers. What is the correct path for filing complaint and demanding that said user have any all such privs revoked? Thanks! Sixty Six 22:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for November 20th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for November 27th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
