User talk:PhATxPnOY916
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia Ads | file info – show another – #42 |
Contents |
[edit] Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here, and decide to stay.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert your name and timestamp, use (~~~~) (four tildes), or, to insert just your name, type (~~~) (three tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you may want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Good luck, have fun, and be bold! SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] BL-80
On exit list when you add to Interstate 80 Business (Sacramento, California); the decomd CA-160 designation is unneed. Decomd routes are little importance to WP:ELG and ELG prohibits colors. Unbuilt is more value to ELG this is why they are always shade in gray means the roads are not built. Freewayguy--Meet 02:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
It tends to be used for more general notes; if the ramps actually connect to another road that then serves as a connection, that's not really important to the overall design of the interchange. --NE2 08:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your nick....
NOW I know where the 916 comes from! Edit Centric (talk) 03:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- lol ... yep, you know it. :) PhATxPnOY916 (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] California State Route 160
- It depends if left exits are important enough to mention - I'm not sure that they are. But it's definitely not useful to mention that it's the south and north end of SR 160, and the fact that it's an onramp to Bus. 80 eastbound is obvious from looking at the list (and the entrance at exit 47B would serve the same purpose), and it's not true because you can exit at Arden Way. The shields in the "end of freeway" colspans are very unnecessary. --NE2 16:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the entrance at exit 47B does serve the same purpose. The exit was originally for Royal Oaks Drive only. Exposition Boulevard dead-ended a few yards west of Tribute Road until the mid-1990s when it was extended to Leisure Lane and the SR 160 ramps. PhATxPnOY916 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hi, I was wondering, do you believe it's perfectly okay to integrate our changes with others' to the exit lists? I actually believe that your changes are for the better intentions. For example, making a note of a 'left' exit is nothing wrong, as well as writing down "south end of SR XX." How do you think we can exemplify our revisions if NE2 keeps reverting them and getting rid of all our changes? This is Wikipedia, not NE2's house. In my opinion, this is unacceptable. What do you plan to do about it? There has to be a better consensus in which we all can agree on. AL2TB Gab or Tab 22:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Of course it is. Thank you, I appreciate it. All I've been doing was following guidelines from the WP:ELG. Plus, I've tried to follow a similar approach of NE2's way of exit lists in other articles lately, only to get slapped in the face with "redundant" and "unneccessary". I guess we all have to come to some sort of compromise, like sticking with the county abbreviations in the mileposts. PhATxPnOY916 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, don't worry too much about those words. He's always going against consensus. Are you aware of the ongoing NE2's arbitration? AL2TB Gab or Tab 05:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Of course it is. Thank you, I appreciate it. All I've been doing was following guidelines from the WP:ELG. Plus, I've tried to follow a similar approach of NE2's way of exit lists in other articles lately, only to get slapped in the face with "redundant" and "unneccessary". I guess we all have to come to some sort of compromise, like sticking with the county abbreviations in the mileposts. PhATxPnOY916 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, I was wondering, do you believe it's perfectly okay to integrate our changes with others' to the exit lists? I actually believe that your changes are for the better intentions. For example, making a note of a 'left' exit is nothing wrong, as well as writing down "south end of SR XX." How do you think we can exemplify our revisions if NE2 keeps reverting them and getting rid of all our changes? This is Wikipedia, not NE2's house. In my opinion, this is unacceptable. What do you plan to do about it? There has to be a better consensus in which we all can agree on. AL2TB Gab or Tab 22:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I added the left exit note. There's no reason to say that it's the south end; that's clear from the infobox, and was actually incorrect how you were doing it, since the south end is SR 4, not SR 4 west. --NE2 22:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] County Route E2 (California)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article County Route E2 (California), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] SR 78
Can you help merge the intersection list with exit list? I'm still having little trouble building exit list.--Freewayguy (Meet) 22:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- It took me awhile, but I got it done. PhATxPnOY916 (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to California State Route 78 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 02:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Postmile abbreviations
Nobody objected to putting the abbreviations in the county column rather than the postmile column; see the bottom of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California State Highways#Section break. Thank you. --NE2 12:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see any changes that were corrections rather than formatting changes, except for the closed eastbound entrance. --NE2 08:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] California State Route 162
Can you help me change to exit list formats? Because I'm nominating the CAint tables for deletions.--Freewayguy (Meet) 01:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I finished reconstructing the list. Have a look at it. --PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 09:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Caltrans' designated freeways
There is NE2's discussion for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California State Highways#Should we use the exact definition of freeway that Caltrans uses?. Some time ago, you added a note to the junction list in US 395 (CA) that US 395 is a freeway at an interchange with SR 70 (CA). That short segment is officially considered a freeway, but NE2 does not believe that your notes in the junction list should belong there. Would you like to say something in the discussion in the link provided above? Thank you! ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 04:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tagalog Wikipedia
Tagalog Wikipedia is campaigning for your participation in writing, editing, assessing and translating articles!
The purpose of this campaign is to expand and improve articles at Tagalog Wikipedia. Your participation will be highly appreciated by the community.
There are over 16,000 articles to view, read, review, edit, and expand, so please visit the Wikipedia Café and the WikiProject Philippines at Tagalog Wikipedia to help out!
The campaign includes seeking your assistance in:
- Providing requested pages
- Providing requested articles
- Providing articles required for all language Wikipedias
- Starting or improving pages that need translation
Or just anything you can do to help us just like what you are doing there at the English Wikipedia.
Thank you in advance and regards, Tagalog Wikipedia CommunityFinally, Wikipedia is the 7th most visited site in the Philippines. Then why is it that the Tagalog Wikipedia, the Wikipedia in your own language remains unknown to most of the Filipinos? The mission of this campaign is to change that. Will you join us?
-- Felipe Aira 02:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Don't listen to NE2
NE2 keeps reverting my edits that directions of I-40 and SR 58 are not needed which is needed on Interstate 15 in California exit list. My advice, don't trust him and don't listen to him. If you have problems with him ask Rschen7754 to have this user blocked for disruption and assuming ownership of articles. --75.47.156.80 (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I've had problems with him before, especially with areas I know about very well, like around Sacramento and surrounding areas. Now I'm just being tolerable and focusing on little edits that don't result in an edit war. I've even provided photos in a couple of talk areas of the article to prove a point. I agree with your edits, though. Even though Caltrans doesn't sign them on the BGS's, I think it's important to add the direction the route number is traveling towards. –PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 01:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
To use warning templates, read WP:UTM. --75.47.139.131 (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- I read up a little on the warning templates. Thanks. I'll try to use them whenever neccessary. –PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 09:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
NE2 has gone crazy. He is not following consensus at all. My main concern is NE2 made bad faith summary edits (which is consider vandalism) on Interstate 96 saying; (No, that wasn't a joke. Please read the section and notice the links.). He removed an auxilliary interstate route template from the Auxilliary Routes section and Rschen7754 restored it back where it belongs and ask NE2 (please read WP:IH). Well guess what NE2 is not as smart at all. --75.47.139.131 (talk) 02:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- I see what your saying. I know he doesn't follow consensus. I've been told. It looks like he spends most of his daily life on here anyway according to his contributions trying to revert everybody's edits because it doesn't fit his standards. –PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 09:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Sometimes NE2 doesn't understand people's questions. He thinks I know everything; while I don't. I don't know much about highways other than California, because most other states I never been to besdie DC, and Chicago/Denver Ariport. And also, he gets upset when people ask him background questions. He say he's not in California, Yea, but doens't mean its true. Also only becasue people say something doesn't mean its neccessairly true. he can be living in Sacramento, or any mountainside.--Freewayguy T C 03:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Alexfusco5 has sometimes wrongly revert changes when shouldn't be and gave false warning message, like he have done to SR 78 a while ago. Your changes was valid, and is not a vandal, and ignore that message Alexfusco gave you.--Freewayguy T C 03:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
The big problem is that NE2 keeps following me around to continue disruption around articles and user pages. --75.47.158.26 (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Talk Page Archiving
To archive your talk page in case this gets bigger, read Help:Archiving a talk page --75.47.154.93 (talk) 11:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. –PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 21:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)