User talk:Ph133710101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chicago, Illinois on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Gogo Dodo 03:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Meg Ryan. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Gogo Dodo 03:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to My butt, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVD+ R/W 03:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Korean language, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. cab 02:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Ph133710101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Whispering(talk/c) 00:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blatant vandalism

Hey, since your edits have been blatant vandalism, I don't think you have much grounds for complaint with regard to people insisting your warnings are kept on your talk page. Perhaps now you've had time to experiment with the Wikipedia you could add something more constructive to it rather than simply resigning. Cheers! Budgiekiller 15:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


-I'm a dork

Yes I had done some vandalism, as I am a dork and wont do anymore, I probably just will stop editing.However can you tell me exactly what the deal is with wikipedia and encyclopedia dramatica??? I cannot get a straight answer out of anyone here! I created a page on them that had violated nothing, it was very short, explaining that they are a saterical site paroding wikiprojects (from the best I can tell) and they are often profane. I also included how there has been some sort of controversy with wikipedia and the dramatica but no factual information exists on the conflict becuz encyclopedia dramatica is satrical and therefore can't count on their information and wikipedia doesn't have any info on them whatsoever. What is going on? Why is encyclopedia dramatica akin to the word "mordor" that isn't even supposed to be uttered aloud in the shire? Whatever is going on it smells, and I've tried asking other people on here with no response. And my page got deleted with no info or reason, what is up??? Not to have a protected page with npov factual info on something becuase it is anti-wikipedia (is thats whats going on?) sounds really fishy to me - it really makes it appear that some admins ban things just becuz of a grudge or something - I have no idea, but I'd like to know whats going on.

Please answer me, I promise I will not be negative or a problem for wikipedia in any way, I'm just a sometimes dumb kid. Thank you in advance for a thorough response.

It's a sore subject. To explain would take much time. Just think of it as saying Mordor in the Shire and you should be alright. But if you really want to know I can see if I can find the diff's about it. Whispering 18:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


Hmm, that is intersting. Its pretty obvious encyclopedia dramatica folks are in fact, well, idiots, but it does seem wikipedia isn't really fulfilling their purpose by treating all information on them like the word 'mordor' I can't really concieve of how it would be a problem to have a locked page on them, but its not like its really a big deal. However it is disapointing to see wikipedia be this way, wikipedia isn't truly living up to its own principles - not that I can really talk, or really care, I certaintly have marks against myself, but in an objective way this is a mark against wikipedia.

-In fact now that I think about it, it was wrong for my page on encyclopedia dramatica to get instantly deleted. It was NPOV and factual, just becuase it is a sore subjuct does not give an admin a right to delete it. This is totally what wikipedia is NOT, at least what its not supposed to be. I don't really care about encyclopedia dramatica, its the principle of the matter thats important. I need to pursue a grievence, however I suppose there is no such thing as it appears admins hold all this power. This is really weird. I know I was being a jerk and screweing around on some things before, but the more I'm learning and researching wikipedia the more I'm finding out you people are no better than the vandalism I was doing earlier. I don't really see the point of me taking the time to contribute anything if it can be arbitrally deleted at will just becuase some admin with no checks on their power feels that way.

Hey, here's a link which explains why the page was deleted in the first place, and some people object to pages be recreated once deleted. I think you make a fair point, if the article you had created was NPOV and factual, it should have been AfD'd rather than just removed by an admin. Oh well, nothing I can do I'm afraid. Keep your chin up and don't quit the whole project on this alone. Budgiekiller 10:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Not to be an ass, but killing budgies is just as mean!