User talk:Pez Dispens3r

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] antogonising the edit process?

No, if somebody writes incorrect, unsupported POV stuff, it should be deleted. It is not "antogonising" anything. If you want to change the things A Cython writes so they are supported and not POV, go a head. But otherwise, I must delete it again. His changes are not an improvement in any way. --Regebro (talk) 05:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

And we can't have a sentence claiming that some types of democracies are more democratic than others. Please remove it immediately. --Regebro (talk) 05:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

If you remove the POV and unsourced things from what he says, nothing is left. That's why I deleted it. As it stands now, it starts with a sentence claiming that some deomcracies are more democratic than others, and the continues from there. If you remove that forst sentence, you have to remove half the addition he made. The next addition is about hus unsourced claims that if you don't have checks and balances, oligrarchy ensues. So then you have to remove that as well... If you want to reformulate it, can you do so on a subpage or in the talk page or something? We shouldn't have that POV crap in the article while you are trying to makeit non-POV. --Regebro (talk) 06:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for improving the paragraph in dispute at the article democracy. A.Cython (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)