User talk:Petreg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Petreg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- ReyBrujo 04:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] George Petre

The article George Petre has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -- ReyBrujo 04:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edits

Hi there. As a registered user, you can begin contributing to Wikipedia, including creating articles. However, there are certain guidelines as to "what" can be created. See Wikipedia:Notability for general suggestions about what is generally accepted. If you have any question, click here, and ask the question there. I will answer as soon as possible. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 04:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Plant communication??

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Plant communication) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Xiahou 00:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] National Identity and Language

Dear Petreg,

As I wondered by in the speedy deletion article category, I discovered the article you created about National Identity and Language. I saw your response about the speedy deletion proposal and decided to delete the banner. Simply because your article doesn't meet the speedy deletions criteria. But your article need a complete rewrite if you want it to stay on wikipedia.

What I mean by a complete rewrite is that in the current form this article is an unsourced, unreferenced essay. While an essay is the type of work you may be required to do for a term paper, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.

First of all please familiarize yourself with WP:NOT to know what type of article can't be posted on wikipedia (your article fit in Original Research category). Then read the WP:OR which is the official policy which explain what is Original Research and why it can't be included in wikipedia.

The difference between an essay and an encyclopedic article is that the essay is a research in itself, it's a paper done to try to prove a point of view, an encyclopedic article is a summary of the knowledge gathered through others research (while citing them) about a particular subject. An essay have a thesis, give argument and give exemple. An encyclopedic article don't have a thesis, nor give an argument, it give some statement followed by sources from which those statement are issued. This process is following one of the three core content guideline Verifiability (the two others are Neutral Point of View and No Original Research ).

You can write about a theory however, for example see the Quantum mechanics or General relativity to give you an idea about how an encyclopedic article look like (sadly I got no Wikipedia:Featured Article to show right now on a theory).

Your article got also some heavy copyediting to do, but that's secondary and I would say entirely normal due to your relatively youth in the wikipedia community. For example the lead of the article should contain the article name in bold. It should begin like "National identity and language (which is by the way the correct capitalisation of the title) is the theory about blablabla<ref="Source1">Robert Duchesne, ''The Relationship between national identity and language''</ref>"

The heading should not be written all in cap.

To sum it up, you will have to completly rewrite this article if you want it to stay in wikipedia. If you think you are able to completly rewrite the article, to meet those criteria do it and delete the tags at the top of the article. If you don't think you are up to this task this article will be deleted in 5 days. (NB: The proposed deletion process give you a delay to manage to rewrite this article, and if you delete this banner, nobody will normally delete this article afterwards. But if you delete this tag without improving the article, this article will most certainly pass through the Article for deletion process in which the deletion is debated and in your case I doubt that your vow to improve the article will influence the consensus that may form there, and in the article case, this article will be deleted).

If you got the gut for it but someone send the article for deletion while you are rewriting it to make it a great article, copy the article and create a subpages in your userpage called User:Petrag/National identity and language, where you will paste your article before deletion so you got a copy to work on and not start again from scratch.

If you got any question or need help with anything, please leave me a message on my talk page and don't forget to sign at the end with ~~~~, I won't bite you :) — Esurnir 05:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)