User talk:Petition
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to TV3 Medford MA, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: TV3 Medford MA was changed by Petition (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-07T04:51:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Spam (self promotion)
Your "Joe Viglioni" entry, according to Wikipedia's definition, is spam:
"Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Spam."
Please stop reverting the article to its earlier state as a blatant piece self-promotion.
If you have different views, please use the article's talk page.
Mick
[edit] Please read
A tag has been placed on joe viglioni, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Please not that you may not revert a page marked for speedy deletion that you have edited yourself.
Please familiarise yourself with the guidelines and stop simply reverting the page created for blatant self-promotion.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joe Viglione. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --omtay38 20:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] No really: PLEASE READ!!!
Please read the following:
[The Joe Viglioni] page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. (CSD G11) Speedy concern: It is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. (CSD G11)
If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with its proposed speedy deletion, please add:
{{hangon}}
directly below this tag, and then explain why you believe this article should not be deleted on its talk page. This will alert administrators to permit you the time to write your explanation.
If the above is not clear, please seek advice from the Wikipedia administrators, don't just revert the page to the blatant piece of self-promotion.
You are deliberately disregarding the guidelines by continuing to revert the article marked for speedy deletion. It is clearly stated that you may *not* simply revert an article of your own creation. As you are unwilling or unable to understand or to follow the guidelines, please seek guidance from an administrator. If you persist in reckless reversion, you may find your account is suspended; that, I suspect, is not a desirous outcome. Mickhunt (talk) 21:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Serial vandal "Mick Hunt"
Mick Hunt appears to have only one edit credit, obsessing over one page on Wikipedia.
