User talk:PET

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, PET, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Selphie 11:03, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) *talk*

1 Albums
2 Italicized titles
3 Music
4 Pictures
5 Hypocrisy
6 Copyright
7 Vote for Mike Garica
8 Our forum
9 Moldovan langauge
10 Re: albums list on bands page
11 response to your question
12 Raspuns dupa cateva luni
13 Image Tagging for Image:Violentfemmes.jpg
14 Control Denied
15 Vino la pagina de discutii Transnistria
16 Votează contra ştergerii articolului Heaven of Transnistria
17 Happy Birthday!
18 Blocking an IP
19 Bizarre reaction to a list of Jesuit activities
20 AfD nomination of VOIS.com
21 Point
22 Reporting an IP
23 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheFragileArtOfExistence.jpg
24 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theverybestoftestament.png
25 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Virus hypocrisy.jpg
26 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Viva Wisconsin.jpg
27 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:3 album vfemmes.jpg
28 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fate The Best Of Death.jpg
29 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofthenew1.jpg
30 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofthenew2.jpg
31 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofthenew3.jpg
32 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live in Eindhoven death.jpg
33 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live in LA death.jpg
34 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hallowed Ground.jpg
35 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live at Eindhoven testament.gif
36 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live at deaf club.jpg
37 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pleasure of Molestation.gif
38 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Catch22album.jpg
39 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mas Borracho.jpg
40 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Obsculum Obscenum.jpg
41 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Penetralia.jpg
42 AfD
43 Fair use rationale for Image:Bestial devastation.jpg

[edit] Albums

Wow, nice work on all the albums you've created! Everytime I create albums of articles, I save them right here, wanna see? -- Mike Garcia | talk 01:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Italicized titles

Hi. I see that you have edited the style of Dead Kennedys albums (you made them italic).....WHY ? I like how the BOLD looks. In my opinion it looks better cand you can read them...better, cos they are bold. --PET 23:35, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

I italicized them because that is the standard style for album titles on Wikipedia, according to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music, specifically [1]: "Albums are italicized and songs are in quotes." --Myles Long 16:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Music

I just got your message. I just have a good taste of music, man. That's why I've created several albums! -- Mike Garcia | talk 21:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures

Hey, I saw you added some pictures to wikipedia, i was looking at some of them, and saw that you have not added a copyright tag to them. Image Copyright tags. Any image on the site has to have a copyright tag, please go back and add a copyright tag to your pictures. --ZeWrestler 12:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, thanks for notice me. I'm starting to add the ©. I have a question. I found a picture Robert Trujillo picutre...but i don't know what copyright tag to put. Any sugetion ? --PET 14:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Where did you get the picture from??--ZeWrestler 15:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hypocrisy

Hi there, good job on creating all the Hypocrisy album pages. I took the liberty of fixing a few things there though, like spelling of last names (Tagtgren/Tägtgren, Szoke/Szöke) and some incorrect years in the album box. I also changed the genre from Black metal to Death metal, hope you don't mind. --Hellqvist 22:53, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Why Hypocrisy are death metal? Personally, I can't see much black metal in their music (except some of the vocals), and they're referred to as "death metal" everywhere. Even on their own home page: http://www.hypocrisy.tv/html/biography.html

Allmusic.com also calls them a death metal band. --Hellqvist 23:25, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright

You cannot copy other web pages into Wikipedia legally without permission. I have already reverted Gary Karr and Victor DeLorenzo to their prior states, and will continue sifting through your contributions. If I sound extremely annoyed, it is because you have been here long enough to know better. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:18, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

Under international law (the Berne Convention), all creative works are copyright with all rights reserved unless it is explicitly stated otherwise. That includes a person's official biography on the person's official site.

In the meantime, I have marked The Gathering (Testament album) as a copyright violation as the bulk of the actual article content consists of a copy/paste from the All Music Guide review. It will be deleted. You may recreate it without the offending material if you would like. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

The offending material has been there since you created the page. There's no "clean" version to revert to. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:43, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vote for Mike Garica

Please feel free to vote for me at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mike Garcia 2. -- Mike Garcia | talk 15:04, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 19:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Moldovan langauge

Salut PET! Feel free to contribute to the page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_language. -- Bonaparte talk 19:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: albums list on bands page

I usually go by

Album Name (1991)
Album Name (1994) -- Mike Garcia 20:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] response to your question

article was rv'd mainly due to your own response on the talk page as to why you added the category in the first place. "Stupid guitars, stupid drumming" would seem to indicate a personal POV on your part rather than a general concensus based on overall public opinion. I won't argue it. I personally don't care for the album. But sooner or later it was bound to get rv'd by somebody. It was an invitation for an edit war. If you can cite a few mass trade publications or some widely available polls to link to then you can throw any arguement back in there because there'll be something to back it up. I see it going on a bit there as far as the 'total sales' goes. 57 million in the U.S. and 84 million worldwide based on some valid sources posted by someone earlier. And yet some people keep going back it and changing it to 'over 200 million sold'. It's probably more emotion than statistical fact.Mr Pyles

[edit] Raspuns dupa cateva luni

Imi cer iertare ca raspund cu asa intarziere, acum este aprilie 14. Da, sunt Petrar, nascut in Maramures si am facut facultatea de medicina in Timisoara intre 1994 si 2000. Am stat in principal in caminul de langa prefectura dar am mai hoinarit si eu :). Nu am raspuns pt ca singura mea conectie de internet e pe celularul meu si acolo am incercat in repetate randuri sa accesez wikipedia dar nu am reusit. Acum sunt pe computerul scolii. Am asteptat-o pe bibliotecara sa apara ca sa-i folosesc computerul si nu a aparut. Daca vrei sa imi scrii, adresele mele sunt felixpetrar@gmail.com si felixpetrar@yahoo.com (prefer gmail). Imi este dificil sa raspund la emailuri pentru ca trebuie sa scriu textul ca si un SMS, apasand fiecare tasta de cateva ori dar imi este usor sa citesc emailuri. Daca imi scrii pe yahoo, pune in subject ceva text Romanesc. Pana de curand am crezut si eu ca Petrar e un nume rar dar am auzit ca sunt mai multi in Moldova... s-ar putea ca venim din Moldova. Bunicul meu din partea tatalui a fost singurul Ortodox intre Greco-Catolici intr-un sat de langa Baia Mare. El a fost Ardelean dar banuiesc ca nu intamplator a fost el Ortodox, ceva stramos de-al lui a venit din Moldova dupa momentul in care au trecut Romanii Ardeleni la Greco-Catolicism. Oricum, suna arhaic dar Latinesc ceea ce mie imi place. Deci eu sunt politic din Maramures dar cultural din Ardeal. Daca cauti cu google pe net nu vei vedea prea multi Petrari. Numele meu este Felix, care e numele tau? Sper sa iti mai verifici wikipedia. Sa ne auzim cu bine... mai ales ca si mie imi placea Panther in tineretile mele. Felix

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Violentfemmes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Violentfemmes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Control Denied

I removed one guy who isn't listed at [emptywords.org Empty words], and cleaned it up a bit too... Spearhead 14:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vino la pagina de discutii Transnistria

În 17 septembrie va fi referendum în Transnistria legat de independenţa regiunii. Cu această ocazie probabil multă lume va căuta pe Wikipedia informaţii despre Transnistria. Am încercat să adaug în articol nişte informaţii legate de acest referendum, anume:

- faptul că mai multe organizaţii antiseparatiste au lansat un apel la boicotare, considerînd referendumul "farsă"

- faptul că din 46 de ţări membre ale Consiliului Europei, 45 sînt împotriva recunoaşterii referendumului, numai RUsia are altă părere

- faptul că datele Comisiei Electorale Centrale din Tiraspol au fost schimbate în mod ciudat, anume numărul total de alegători s-a micşorat cu 7% faţă de 2005, ceea ce ridică suspiciuni asupra unei încercări de creştere artificială a prezenţei la vot prin raportarea unui număr mai mic de alegători înregistraţi.

Totdeauna am dat lincurile care dovedesc cele scrise de mine, n-am născocit nimic din burtă.

Userul Willian Mauco, care pare fan Tiraspol, mereu mi-a şters adăugirile. (vezi istoria paginii)

Puteţi vedea la pagina de discuţii Transnistria ce argumente a adus. Anume: ăia care cer boicotarea referendumului din Transnistria sînt foşti KGB-işti, că aşa zice o organizaţie rusească de analiză (a dat un linc pentru asta). Întîi a spus că respectivii nici nu sînt din Transnistria, ci doar din Basarabia, dar i-am dovedit că unii dintre semnatarii apelului la boicot sînt transnistreni. Am fost împăciuitor, i-am zis că n-are decît să adauge părerea organizaţiei ruseşti că antiseparatiştii sînt foşti KGBişti, că n-are decît să-i considere pe cei care vor boicotarea referendumului drept băieţi răi, dar faptul în sine, că s-a cerut boicotarea referendumului, trebuie menţionat. Degeaba, mereu mi s-au şters adăugirile - pentru celelalte 2 fapte nici n-a adus argumente.

A mai fost o adăugire care a şters-o, despre arestarea a 4 persoane din Transnistria care sînt împotriva separatismului (între timp li s-a dat drumul). În cazul ăsta am renunţat eu să mai insist pentru includerea informaţiei în articol (deşi informaţia e incontestabilă), tocmai fiindcă n-am vrut să mă cert prea mult.

În perioada asta cînd agenţiile de ştiri vor menţiona referendumul de la Tiraspol, se va citi articolul Transnistria în Wikipedia poate mai mult decît într-un an întreg. De aia acum e nevoie să existe în articol informaţii despre contestarea corectitudinii referendumului. Nu cer să se menţioneze ca adevăr absolut faptul că referendumul e incorect, ci doar că există unii (OSCE, 45 din 46 ţări ale Consiliului Europei, unele organizaţii din zonă şi din Basarabia) care consideră asta. Vă cer de aceea sprijinul ca să interveniţi pe pagina de discuţii Transnistria pentru a susţine rămînerea informaţiei în pagină şi să repuneţi informaţia atunci cînd Mauco o şterge (eu nu pot să verific chiar 24 de ore din 24). Evitaţi atacurile suburbane, păstraţi ton civilizat. mulţumesc.

Who is William Mauco Here is an article about a Wikipedia celebrity, William Mauco, and his relations with the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty (ICDISS), an organisation "which seems to be a front organisation for a Kremlin-backed rogue statelet called Transdniestria" (quote from the article) http://0.bypass-filter.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2Vkd2FyZGx1Y2FzLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8yMDA2LzA4L2dvdGNoYS0yLmh0bWw%3D

Edward Lucas wrote about Mauco: "The other lead is William Mauco. He has an extensive record of posting intelligent and fairly neutral entries on Wikipedia, not only about TD but about other unrecognised statelets. Crucially, these predate ICDISS's birthday of January 2006. And he also claims to have been at their conference in Mexico City in April of this year. I have written to him asking to get in touch, and had a friendly email in reply. I am planning to follow up this research in an article in European Voice at the end of August, so watch this space!"--MariusM 08:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Votează contra ştergerii articolului Heaven of Transnistria

Împreună cu EvilAlex (un tip din Tighina - Transnistria) am creat un articol despre propaganda separatistă a Tiraspolului Heaven of Transnistria. I s-a cerut ştergerea. Te rog ajută-ne să păstrăm articolul, votînd contra ştergerii[2]. Destul s-a şters din articolul principal Transnistria, Wikipedia e plină de propagandă a Tiraspolului, să avem măcar un articol care explică această propagandă--MariusM 18:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, PET! Wishing you a very happy birthday and an awesome upcoming year! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

Best regards from the Birthday Committee and myself! --lov e laughterlife♥^talk? 04:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocking an IP

If you have noticed a consistent set of vandalization, you first need to warn editor/vandal using the test templates found here. If the user has been given a final warning via the test4 template, the IP can be reported here; be sure to follow its instructions. Hope this helps. -- GJD 17:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bizarre reaction to a list of Jesuit activities

Whatever you FEEL like it says, it actually "says" a list of their apostolates; they run 28 colleges and universities in US alone, plus the Weston School of Theology, the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, and individual Jesuits have and do serve on the faculties of dozens of other universities, plus they run several scholarly and semi-popular publications, and that's just for openers and only in the US -- so saying that "Their works are focused on education and intellectual contributions, primarily at colleges and universities," is not cheerleading. The "as well as missionary work " is built into their own constitutions: technically they were founded as a missionary order, and jesuit missions are found today all over Africa, South America, Asia and the Pacific Islands. The "ministry in human rights and social justice" is witnessed by the fact that they have their own, full-blown NGO, The Jesuit Refugee Service, and jesuits serve on the stafs of a wide variety of deomestic and foreign social justice agencies. Nowhere does this paragraph say Jesuits are the "only" ones to do all this, or that they "do it better than anyone else." The sentence is simple and NPOV: the fact you react to it with such "feelings" is something that should prompt an examination of why, on your poart, not removal from the article.HarvardOxon 23:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of VOIS.com

An editor has nominated VOIS.com, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VOIS.com and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Point

You might want to read WP:POINT as well as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, every article has to stand on its own. The nexopia article for example had two clear citations from reliable sources (two major newspaper, the edmonton journal and the globe and mail). We don't keep an article which fails policy and guidelines simply because another one does, we examine that other article. On the consumating article you notice I actually nominated it for deletion, but notability was properly established Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Consumating. the sportsvite one is the only one that really should be tagged of those three, notability is likely, but proper citation hasn't been provided.--Crossmr (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reporting an IP

If you see an IP who is vandalizing actively have a look at WP:AIV. This is used for IPs who are vandalizing at the moment. if its been more than 30-60 minutes since their last edit, they're unlikely to block them then.--Crossmr (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheFragileArtOfExistence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheFragileArtOfExistence.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theverybestoftestament.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Theverybestoftestament.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Virus hypocrisy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Virus hypocrisy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Viva Wisconsin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Viva Wisconsin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:3 album vfemmes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3 album vfemmes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fate The Best Of Death.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fate The Best Of Death.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofthenew1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daysofthenew1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofthenew2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daysofthenew2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofthenew3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Daysofthenew3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live in Eindhoven death.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Live in Eindhoven death.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live in LA death.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Live in LA death.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hallowed Ground.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hallowed Ground.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live at Eindhoven testament.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Live at Eindhoven testament.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Live at deaf club.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Live at deaf club.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pleasure of Molestation.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Pleasure of Molestation.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Catch22album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Catch22album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mas Borracho.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mas Borracho.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Obsculum Obscenum.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Obsculum Obscenum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Penetralia.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Penetralia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

[edit] AfD

Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article Hattrick. There is a new AfD here. Regards, Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 05:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bestial devastation.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bestial devastation.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)