User:Peter M Dodge/Archives/archive dec302006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Question

Hello, would it be alright if I asked you a couple questions about your view of the Naming Conventions case? --Elonka 02:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Would be fine as long as you realize I don't appreciate being pressured, and reserve the right not to answer questions that are I feel are inappropriate, improper, or am not at the liberty to speak about. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 15:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] We Thank You

Hey, Wiz! I got your message aand am replying (obviously). You guys are most certianly welcome and am just glad to help. The only"repayment" I need is you guys to be happy (and if I can help with the real life issues tel me). Happy Winterval (the cards below)! —¡Randfan!Sign here? 17:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm here if you ever do need something. It's really the least I can do. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 18:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks, and in addition...

Hi Peter, thanks for the well wishes. Let me also say that I'm sorry to hear that you are having health problems, and also that your life has been affected by the death of one close to you. I don't know the details, nor do I know when precisely this occurred, but I do know that the holiday season is a particularly difficult time to mourn someone. I wish there were something I could say that could take that pain away. I hope that over time, the pain of your loss will be leavened by the memories of the good times you shared. I also want to thank you on behalf of E@L for your support of her during her difficulties. I hope that I can be there for you too if you need support. Thanks again, --Kyoko 04:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

She thanks me enough as it is :) I appreciate the thought though. Mm. As to the specifics, well without getting into the background or details too much, my ex and friend Reena committed suicide a few weeks ago. Anyways, let me know if I can ever be of help and I'll happily oblige. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 01:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Peter, I hadn't expected a reply on your talk page, but fortunately this page is on my watchlist. I wasn't trying to pry, and you needn't have told me. But now that I have some idea what happened, I'm saddened by her death, and I hope that you will try not to blame yourself for what she did. I have the feeling that I've been saying this a lot recently, but I hope that with time, the pain of her loss won't be as crushing as it is now. In my experience, the pain of losing someone you love never completely goes away.
If you were wondering about why I find this time of year so hard to go through, in short, my best friend died almost eleven years ago, and the anniversary of her death is rapidly approaching. I've told Ayelie the full story if she cares to tell you. And yes, it still hurts, but the pain isn't constantly overwhelming as it once was.
It will probably sound ludicrous or even insulting for me to wish you Happy Holidays at this time. I know how alienating it can be when you see people all around you who are smiling and laughing when you just feel miserable, but I hope that you find some joy or at least some comfort during this season, and if I can help you towards that, please tell me. Best wishes, --Kyoko 04:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
You guys help more than you know. Helping E@L as you guys have has put me at peace considerable, I worried a lot about her, and I know I am not the only one. Thank you. Love, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 19:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, fucking yay. I come here to thank you for trying to cheer me up and see you're having the same kind of problems. I don't know what to say except ... tough it out, kid, like I am. This is not a good year, but there's always tomorrow. Okay, I'm going to stop trying to cheer anyone up, and just...take a nap or something. *hugs Peter* --ElaragirlTalk|Count 21:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC) On Wikibreak due to Drama Overload
We do best to remember the good times, and not their passing. And there's always the magical ball of fire :) Hang tough Elara. You're a good person. ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 21:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please feel better

I hope you are feeling ok. If there is anything I can do to help you, I will try my best.--CJ King 22:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Eh. Nothing is going to bring Reena, or the others I lost before her, back. I simply try not to dwell on such things. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 22:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ==James McCune Smith==

My edits tonight are my Christmas present to you. Be well and have a wonderful time. NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 05:31, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Online bullying by Oden

I hope you understand why i was angry towards Oden. Perhaps you were not present to mediate this... Oden has been constantly abusing the system by overwriting my works and accuse me of using copyrighted materials whereby he himslef is doing the same... as far as iam concerned, i have seen other editors has expand the article and made minor changes to make the article looked more profound, but Oden is trying to be a smart-aleck by stating facts which arent true at all! Please help me by telling him not to carry on abusing me, if he should he should state it nicely in his own words, not copying and paste the words possible. I am frustrated, I hope you do not take side on him...YuRiPa 15:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

The wrong conduct of one user does not vindicate improper conduct on your part. Strive to be better, not just as bad, or worse. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 15:06, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disageee

On [1]. DR should not grant immunity from PAIN, just as content RfC does not grants immunity from 3RR. Comments at DR are not outside the scope of WP:CIV, at least not according to any policy I am familiar with.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

  • With all due respect, NPA is not the civility police. We are not here to tell everybody to regard others with flowery speech, simply to avoid pointed personal attacks that lead to disputes and divides in the community. If there is a personal attack, then that is the purview of PAIN, if not, then it should go somewhere else. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 20:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi Peter

Would you do me a favor and click on the bottom two external links in this version of Decline of Buddhism in India? Here it is:[[2]]. Freedom Skies says they're dead links, but I can see them just fine. Can you?

Hi Peter,
Please disregard the above. It's handled to the best of my ability now.
I've removed all users from my Watchlist. I've also removed some common areas. I'm letting you know so that if you need to respond to me - please do so on my talk page. Sorry about the length of my talk page; I will be archiving soon.
As they say in Christian parlance, I'm "letting go and letting God". There is a Buddhist equivalent to this, but it gets too complicated to explain. In any event, please contact me any way you feel like and whenever you feel like it. NinaNinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 19:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not sure how to proceed

User Nelson Ricardo took a cleanup on my talk page a bit too personally and decided to be publicly rude to me, in turn, I responded with an explaination of talk page etiquette. I was then personally attacked in a very deliberate and flagrant manner. diff: [3] --Haizum μολὼν λαβέ 22:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Hmm, the best bet is to report him on WP:PAIN if they're not already there. If they are, make a note of this misbehaviour for myself or another reviewer as we go through the reports. Be sure to post diffs. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 22:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:PAIN requires that a warning tag be in place before an incident is reported, that's why didn't submit one. --Haizum μολὼν λαβέ 22:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
That's not a hard and fast rule. The thrust and point of the rule is that they have to have been warned of their misconduct beforehand (ie, they are not being blind-sided by it). Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 22:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Will do

I have had to deal with very persistent people one of whom does not research thoroughly but thinks it's unfair if someone loses his patience and makes remarks about competence and the other feels that doesn't this article say that pretty much after Khilji it was all over for Buddhists anyway except for out in the Himalayas? If you follow the edit patterns of the editors in question you'll see them repeating every single act of Hindu actions thrice or more in the article and downplaying on moslem actions, removing citations from the BBC about the Hinduism/religious non conversion priciple and basiclly following an agenda which has the article as the first casuality. I cite, correct and condense only to have it removed by people who can't write encyclopedic articles but are in it to push POV.

You adviced me "Calling someone disruptive, is, in and of itself, disruptive." "you are starting to sound and act disruptive." was the remark by Nina that made me lose my patience.

In any event, thanks for the friendly warning. All core policies should be followed by everyone involved, including myself.

Freedom skies| talk  18:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Precisely my point. I discussed the same thing with Nina on IRC (indeed my words were a little stronger to her than to you) .. If you saw the message about me wanting to discuss things with her on IRC on her talk, that's what it was about. I don't think either of you were entirely in the right, but you have to realize that part of NPOV is representing as many pertinent points of view as possible, such as how Will Beback and I handled the links section in Lou Dobbs. Just realize that you're both not saying the uncivil things you said out of malice - you're both just frustrated with each other. Take a moment, sit down, take a breath, and remember that you're both just doing what you're doing to help improve the encyclopedia. I can tell you that Nina may be someone direct but she's a good person and respected editor. She may have made a mistake for standing up for Tigeroo (I'd aghree with you if you said so), however, she was only doing it because she felt that he was a newbie being bitten - so please realise that she is acting out of good faith, as I am sure you are as well. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 20:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandal and Sock Puppet Problems

I'll list this for you to show how I tried to take care of the problem. Originally I made note here at the bottom. I just wanted it to be known to be people that a mass revert took place by the user Apocalyptic Destroyer. As far as I know the IP 70.19.145.44 who is Guardian Tiger who is Apocalyptic Destroyer, who is RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH who is RevolverOcelotX. The last two users are banned accounts for Sock Puppet and Vandalism. I made a second request for a RevOcX her here and was subsequently deleted by the above IP. The above IP also tagged my IP adress for a 3RR ( here )although I had not made any reversion recently. Then this Guardian Tiger followed me around to edit what I edited. I will make another attempt at a user check because now to me it is obvious the user is using the same (false) bully tactics and reversions to the same pages to his old user. I truly apologize for bringing this up on your page, but I wanted to make sure someone saw this. I will once again try to make a check user.ShuckyDucky 18:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I made a report hereThank You.ShuckyDucky 18:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate it. I noticed you even dotted my "I"(so to speak) up above. I hope the format makes sense as I was trying to show the difference in edits. Thanks again!ShuckyDucky 21:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New sockpuppet allegation

I noticed that you have removed information you considered private from a post in the sockpuppet investigation. That was information that was vital to the defense against the false allegation. Please communicate that entire post to the admin who conducts the Checkuser investigation. - DP1976 19:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

The information will be available to them if they do a checkuser request, so they'd see it in any event. I merely removed it from the public eye as it's release was a privacy policy problem. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 19:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Can you believe this? I'd appreciate it, Peter, if you'd look into the Talk:Free Republic discussion and the sockpuppet investigation. There are two users here, BenBurch and FAAFA, with extensive and turbulent histories here during their entire eight months at WP. This includes protracted edit wars, extensive use of personal attacks, and generally troll-like behavior. Abundant evidence thereof is available in the archives of their own Talk pages. Let me thank you in advance for your kind attention to this matter. It's making continued participation at WP very unpleasant for the targets of their false accusations. - DP1976 21:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  • It would be improper for me as a CU clerk to comment on a dispute when there is a CU request open regarding it. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 21:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)