From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am a graduate student working on my MS Thesis in Biology at San Francisco State University. My topic is a taxonomic monograph, "Psilocybe and Allies of California".
On Wikipedia, I'd like to contribute and improve upon the various articles on Psilocybe. Except for the article on psilocybin, most of these articles are now stubs and what little information they do contain is often inaccurate. (May 24, 2005) As of this writing, the Psilocybe article is in better shape, but in need of proper citation in referencing. Much of the content was moved to Psilocybin mushrooms, which needs some cleanup. Articles on individual Psilocybe species are an absolute mess and will be a big project. Peter G Werner 17:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My Wikipedia philosophy
One thing I really appreciate about Wikipedia is the sheer depth of subjects covered, as well as its timeliness. If you wanted to find an obscure details of the present taxonomic status of the Tricholomataceae, an overview of San Francisco's Mission School art movement, the iodine value of lard, a biography of Matokie Slaughter, or just what goes on in the San Francisco Armory, you'll find it in Wikipedia and not the Encyclopedia Britannica. (That's the ideal, anyway, there are still many important topics that are barely covered in Wikipedia. And, of course, there are lots of downsides to Wikipedia – much of the content is incomplete, poorly written, or biased, and most articles lack any proper citation.)
Because I appreciate this depth, my general Wikipedia orientation is "inclusionist". I take issue with the idea that only the kinds of subjects that would go into Encyclopedia Britannica should be included in Wikipedia. However, I'm definitely a moderate inclusionist. I don't buy the argument that Wikipedia should be about "everything". I respect the fact that Wikipedia has standards of notability and that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not any number of other things. Because of this, I find myself arguing "Delete" as often as "Keep" in AfD debates. (I've even nominated a few articles for deletion.)
I'm also a bit of a "mergist", in that I'd rather see a single good article with broad coverage about a group of things then a bunch of content forks and ton of tiny little stubs about related topics. To that end, when I start articles on groups of living organisms that aren't well covered on Wikipedia, I typically cover the topic from the "top down", starting with an article on a genus or family and later breaking out articles on notable species as necessary. I find this creates fewer messy content forks.
[edit] Contact
Special:Emailuser/Peter_G_Werner
[edit] My contributions
[edit] Projects I've started
|
Userbox
| Mac |
This user is contributing using a Macintosh computer. |
 |
This user enjoys film. |
| . The |
This user does not put two spaces after a full stop. |
 |
This user is frequently accused of being a Zionist. |
|
[edit] Articles entirely or mostly written by me
[edit] Articles in which I've made a significant contribution
I hereby award you a Barnstar for your excellent and numerous large-scale article contributions to Wikipedia in the area of
mycology. Your dedication in sharing your area of expertise, maintaining neutrality and providing high-quality information is an example to us all. Well done and please keep up the good work --
Serephine
[edit] Disambiguation pages I've created
[edit] Topics of Interest
[edit] Miscellaneous bookmarks
[edit] External links
