Talk:Peter Vardy (theologian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

hey ho. how lush is the dear, dr. vardy's sweater vests,eh?! i find him to be rather fetching myself ;o)

hear, hear - what an intelligent and bright person you must be... in light of such a captivating comment, i have set up an email address Dr_Peter_Vardy_is_a_fitty@hotmail.com to recieve any articles, photo's or such like regarding the very fab Dr. Vardy. i look forward to your insights.

I have to agree with the two above comments. Vardy is quite the legend. His article needs improving; he deserves it. Wright123 15:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Vardy rules!!!

I did a lot of Vardy for my A level course. He and Richard Swinburne are the greatest!

---

"His book, The Puzzle of God, refers to the God who performs miracles for individuals but seems to ignore the masses, such as those in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima. He argues that "Such a God, at the least, needs to face some hard moral questioning.""

Is this paragraph worth taking out? I don't see how it contributes to the article at all. It is only one of his arguments not one of his views. Amyeis 01:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Quiet down children, we're all captivated by Dr. Vardy's sexual magnitism, that is whithout doubt, but even by Wikipedia standards this article does not do the great man justice. Does anyone actually have anything significant to add to this article? --SAS87 22:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)