Talk:Peter Pan's Flight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Audio-animatronics
I can't find any information on the Web to support that in the original Disneyland version, there were no Audio-Animatronics. The article mentions this twice--that the Magic Kingdom version featured AAs, and that the Disneyland version was updated to feature AAs in 1983. I didn't remove it the references, and I don't doubt its true, but if anyone can find a reference, please add it! =)
Sorry, I dont have a reference, but for me it brings up the question: what constitutes an audio-animatronic? Lots of older disney rides had kinetic displays, some two-dimensional some sculptural but with static facial expressions. The article could be more clear about what part had animation added. Also want to point out that the storyline is told in full twice, could someone reduce one of the storyline tellings and put the full telling in a seperate "storyline" section. Thanks 76.212.149.1 (talk) 13:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Sandy
- There's a wiki article if you're curious: Audio-Animatronics.
- The article could be organized better, but I don't see where the storyline is told twice. There are some overlapping notes, but they're about different locations of the ride. You are welcome to improve the ariticle if you like. --Linda (talk) 09:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Maximum Capacity
I updated the maximum capacity of Disneyland section for the attraction to reflect the current Disneyland Resort policy of two adults and one child. --Andysund 07:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Conveyor belt
A recent editor said there was no conveyor belt, but in WDW, the ride does use a belt to load guests. It isn't a omnimover ride though, its an overhead monorail system. --blm07 08:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- I removed "omnimover" because at Disneyland there's no conveyor belt. I didn't know they used a conveyor belt at WDW. I guess since it's an overhead monorail, it's still not an omnimover - as you said. --Linda 05:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)