Talk:Peter's Two Dads

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter's Two Dads article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Peter's Two Dads has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
January 25, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Family Guy Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Family Guy, an attempt to improve and build up a detailed and comprehensive guide to Family Guy on the English Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can become a member and contribute to the discussion, or you can edit the article associated with this page. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article is on a subject of mid-importance within Family Guy. Tasks you can do: Remember Family Guy characters are not real. Don't nitpick on continuity, because continuity is Family Guy's bitch. Don't attempt to recreate the humor of the show. This rarely works, and is contrary to the purpose of an encyclopedia. Cleanup Add out-of-universe information. Replace explicit references to episodes with episode citations. Move superfluous examples of character actions to appropriate episode pages. Prune Cultural references sections, removing non-notable examples of things no one needs explained. Convert trivia sections into freakin' brilliant prose. Shorten plot synopses. Attach the {{evilmonkey}} tag to "forum" comments on Family Guy related Discussion pages. Identify editors who swap in smart quotes for typewriter quotes and beat them bloody. Build the project Help finish project tasks. Invite quality editors to participate. Welcome new editors. Announce Let other Project members know what you've done! Comedy Portal This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

• Peter said thta throwing Meg's birthday part will be worse than getting stuck behing Robert Loggia at the airport.

• Have you noticed that when Stewie knocks his glass od juice of his high seat to antagonize Lois, it soundslike the glass shattered but it didnt even break. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.138.131 (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Star Wars 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Starwarsfrancis.png 3 Good article nomination 4 GA Review 5 Other Cultural References

[edit] Star Wars

Concerning the references section, in which movie did Han call Leia 'Carrie'? Lots42 05:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Starwarsfrancis.png

Image:Starwarsfrancis.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article nomination

I noticed that this article is up for Good Article, but you have no template on this article saying it is. You should add one. ISD (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

That would be my fault, I always forget something :) Qst 10:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

This article is well-written and meets the criteria of a good article, in my opinion. Before it is approved, the lead of the article should be edited to avoid duplicating material that belongs in the Plot section. Additionally, the Production section could be split into multiple paragraphs to enhance readability. --BradV 22:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

The latter comment is good, but the introduction is meant to consist of a brief synopsis of the plot. Qst 21:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

• 1. It is well written. In this respect:

The negativity of Francis was becoming dull to write for" quotation mark at the end, but none at the beginning...I'd add it, but not sure if it is suppose to even been quote marks there. The line "MacFarlane comments it would not have looked good without computer aid, and it makes the scene more realistic if it includes it" could be written a little better, unless it is a direct quote is there any significance of the last production entry of the 2 men circling each other?

• 2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:

(a) (b) (c)

• 3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:

(a) (b)

• 4. It is neutral
• 5. It is stable
• 6. It is illustrated

Ctjf83^talk 22:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done. Qst 22:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Other Cultural References

• Mother Theresa in the car is a reference to Pulp Fiction?
• When Peter's mother asks if he was bringing the TV back he responds that he sold it for crack, does anyone see the reference to Requiem for a Dream
• When Peter and His dad are dancing they break chairs over the heads of some Riverdancers.
• Reference to Brian's "twin" sheep O'brien asking "Who's leg do I have to hump to get a pint of Guinness over here?"

Angel of Anubis (talk) 06:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

You have to find a reliable source for all this. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep, and IMDb and TV/com are unreliable for cultural references. Qst (talk) 10:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Watched the episode, thought I would ask. and I didn't get anything from IMDB or TV. Typed em as I was watching the episode Angel of Anubis (talk) 03:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Also where exactly would one find a "reliable" source for this, I mean aside from the episode itself, where? Angel of Anubis (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Audio commentary, newspaper article, interviews with the makers. Please keep in mind that television shows aren't always reliable, for example, if South Park would parody some event, you can't use that as a reliable source because they aren't copying the event, they're making fun of it. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)