Template talk:Peruvian legislative election, 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Peru Portal This template is supported by the Peru WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Template	This page has been rated as template-Class on the Project's quality scale.
WikiProject Peru To-do: edit  Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Wildife of Peru, Fauna of Peru, Jorge Eduardo Eielson, Alberto Flores Galindo, Morococha Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Mario Vargas Llosa GAC: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention

[edit] Number of seats

The ONPE results indicate that APRA won 35 seats and the other seat went to Alliance for Progress. [1] but this pdf file from the Peru Election 2006 analysis site says that it went to APRA with 36 [2]. I reverted it but maybe I'm wrong.--Jersey Devil 08:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I would usually go with ONPE, but I think they just made a mistake there. Alliance for Progress is very far from the 4% minimum or 5 seats in 2 districts. Let's just wait for clearer results before changing it, though. --Gabbec 16:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, now ONPE contradicts itself: here they say it's 36 for APRA, and here, if I'm counting right, there are 36 elected congressmen for APRA as well. Alliance for Progress is not mentioned in either, so I'm pretty sure someone messed up on ONPE's other page. I guess the final word should be JNE's, since they have to proclaim the official results and I haven't seen anything on their website or elsewhere, but I'm going to change it for now. --Gabbec 16:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)